KEVIN NORTON, CSC Docket No. 2023-1362
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 28, 2024, CSC Docket No. 2023-1362: discipline, penalty modified. Kevin Norton, Police Officer, Wanaque, Police Department, removal, effective December 1, 2022, on charges of incompetency, inefficiency or failure to perform duties, conduct unbecoming
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 28, 2024
Kevin Norton, Police Officer, Wanaque, Police Department, removal, effective December 1, 2022, on charges of incompetency, inefficiency or failure to perform duties, conduct unbecoming a public employee, neglect of duty and other sufficient cause.
- Matter
- Discipline
- Decided
- February 28, 2024, item A-5
- Outcome
- Penalty modified
- ALJ's recommendation
- Modify the removal to a 45 working day suspension.
- Penalty appealed
- removal
- Penalty after the decision
- suspension
- Recorded vote
- Allison Chris Myers (Yes), Dolores Gorczyca (No), Daniel W. O’Mullan (Yes), Christina Mongon (Yes)
- Title
- POLICE OFFICER
- Employer
- Wanaque Borough
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission modified the removal to a six-month suspension.
The decision
BackgroundThe appeal of Kevin Norton, Police Officer, Wanaque, Police Department, removal, effective December 1, 2022, on charges, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Thomas R. Betancourt (ALJ), who rendered his initial decision on January 18, 2024. Exceptions and replies were filed on behalf of the appellant and appointing authority.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ's initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, including a thorough review of the exceptions and reply, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), at its meeting on February 28, 2024, adopted the ALJ's Findings of Facts and Conclusions. However, it did not adopt his recommendation to modify the removal to a 45 working day suspension. Rather, the Commission imposed a six-month suspension.
Administrative Law JudgeIn this matter, the ALJ found that the appellant was guilty of all of the infractions alleged with the exception of the falsification charge. It its exceptions, the appointing authority contends that charge should have also been sustained. The Commission disagrees. The ALJ explicitly detailed his reasons for finding that charge was not sustained. Upon its de novo review of the ALJ's determination in that regard, the Commission agrees with the ALJ's findings on the charges and finds nothing in the appointing authority's exceptions to demonstrate that the ALJ's findings on that charge was arbitrary, capricious or unreasonable.
AnalysisThe Commission also agrees that the dismissal of that charge warrants a lesser penalty than originally imposed. In this regard, similar to its assessment of the charges, the Commission review of the penalty is de novo. In addition to its consideration of the seriousness of the underlying incident in determining the proper
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.