County Correctional Police Officer (S9999A), CSC Docket No. 2023-724
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 23, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2023-724: request for enforcement, ordered. The Division of Agency Services requests that the Civil Service Commission order Mercer County to properly dispose of the September 16, 2021, certification of the eligible list for C
Commission decisions · Meeting of November 23, 2022
The Division of Agency Services requests that the Civil Service Commission order Mercer County to properly dispose of the September 16, 2021, certification of the eligible list for County Correctional Police Officer (S9999A).
- Matter
- Request for enforcement
- Decided
- November 23, 2022, item B-16
- Outcome
- Ordered
- Title
- COUNTY CORRECTIONAL POLICE OFFICER
- Examination
- S9999A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-016 11-23-22 ENFCG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission ordered the appointing authority to properly dispose of the certification and pay compliance costs in the amount of $1,000.
Rules this decision applies
- N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5
- N.J.A.C. 4A:10
- N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1
- N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.8(b)
- N.J.S.A. 11A:10-3
- N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1(a)2
- N.J.A.C. 4A:10-3.2(a)5
The decision
BackgroundThe Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) requests that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) order Mercer County to properly dispose of the September 16, 2021, certification of the eligible list for County Correctional Police Officer (S9999A).
By way of background, the September 16, 2021, (OL210853) certification containing 501 names was issued to Mercer County. Mercer County returned the certification on March 8, 2022. By letter dated April 5, 2022, Agency Services returned the certification to Mercer County stating that it needed to provide documentation and/or reasons to support its requests to remove and/or bypass eligibles from the list within 10 days from the date of the letter. Specifically, Agency Services indicated that Mercer County needed to provide documentation to support the removal and/or bypass of more than 30 eligibles. Additionally, Agency Services indicated that reasons for removal, bypass, or non-selection were not acceptable for 19 other eligible. After multiple emails from Agency Services, on July 14, 2022, it emailed Mercer County indicating that there were still 32 active deficiencies. However, Mercer County did not respond to Agency Services’ July 14, 2022, communication regarding this certification and the matter was referred to the Division of Appeals and Regulatory Affairs (DARA) for enforcement.
Subsequently, DARA sent a letter to Mercer County regarding the outstanding certification, indicating that pursuant to N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10- 2.2(a)2, the Commission may assess examination costs and/or order an appointment from the certifications at issue. Additionally, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:10.2.2(b), the Commission may also take any action set forth in N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1 including the assessment of costs, charges and fines. Despite several opportunities to do so, Mercer
County has not returned the certification as requested nor has it submitted any additional information for the Commission to review in this matter.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.8(b) requires an appointing authority to notify Agency Services of the disposition of a certification by the disposition due date in the manner prescribed by this agency. Clearly, Mercer County has violated this vital regulation for certification OL210853 as it has not remedied the numerous deficiencies identified. Therefore, Mercer County is ordered to return the certification within 20 days of the issuance of this decision with any requested documentation. The Commission is specifically given the power to assess compliance costs and fines against an appointing authority, including all administrative costs and charges, as well as fines of not more than $10,000, for noncompliance or violation of Civil Service law or rules or any order of the Commission. N.J.S.A. 11A:10-3; N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.1(a)2. See In the Matter of Fiscal Analyst (M1351H), Newark, Docket No. A-4347-87T3 (App. Div. February 2, 1989). Therefore, given this Agency’s efforts thus far to secure compliance, it is appropriate to assess compliance costs in the amount of $1,000 at this time. If, at any time, Mercer County does not adhere to the timeframes for the proper certification disposition without an approved extension of time, it shall be assessed fines of $100 per day for each day of continued violation that it fails to adhere to the timeframes, up to a maximum fine of $10,000.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that Mercer County properly dispose of the September 16, 2021, certification of the eligible list for County Correctional Police Officer (S9999A) within 20 days of the issuance of this decision.
Moreover, the Commission orders that the costs incurred by this agency in the compliance process be assessed against Mercer County in the amount of $1,000 pursuant to N.J.S.A. 11A:10-3 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-3.2(a)5, to be remitted within 30 days of the issuance of this order.
If, at any time, Mercer County does not adhere to the timeframes for the proper certification disposition without an approved extension of time, it shall be assessed fines of $100 per day for each day of continued violation that it fails to adhere to the timeframes, up to a maximum fine of $10,000.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- In the Matter of Fiscal Analyst (M1351H), Newark Docket No. A-4347-87T3 (February 2, 1989)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.