NJ Civil Service Navigator

Marcella Traina, CSC Docket No. 2023-801

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 18, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2023-801: examination eligibility, granted. Marcella Traina appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the education requirements for the open competitive examination for Assistant Planne

Commission decisions · Meeting of January 18, 2023

Marcella Traina appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the education requirements for the open competitive examination for Assistant Planner (C1062D), Hudson County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
January 18, 2023, item B-6
Outcome
Granted
Title
ASSISTANT PLANNER
Employer
Hudson County
Examination
C1062D
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundMarcella Traina appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the education requirements for the open competitive examination for Assistant Planner (C1062D), Hudson County.

The subject examination’s closing date was August 22, 2022. The education requirements were a Bachelor’s degree with 21 semester hour credits in professional planning subjects such as the principles of land use planning, history of city planning, planning project design, and planning law and administration. The experience requirements were one year of professional experience in municipal, county, regional, or state planning. Possession of a current and valid license as a Professional Planner in New Jersey issued by the State Board of Professional Planners could have been substituted for the education requirement. Possession of a Master’s degree in Planning could have been substituted for one year of experience. A total of three applicants applied and two were found eligible. Certification OL221196 was issued containing the names of the two eligibles and was disposed of on January 18, 2023, with one eligible receiving an appointment. The list expires on October 12, 2025.

On the appellant’s application, she indicated that she possessed a Bachelor’s degree in Planning and Public Policy. She also indicated that she provisionally served in the subject title from November 2020 to the closing date, and was a Seasonal Planner for Bayonne from May 2018 to August 2018. Agency Services determined that she met the experience requirements, and had a Bachelor’s degree with six credits in professional planning, but it determined that she lacked 15 required credits.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant asserts that she meets the education requirements. She indicates which colleges courses that she believes meets the requirements, and she submits her college transcript and course descriptions for these classes.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)2 requires applicants to possess all the requirements specified in an announcement for an open competitive examination by the closing date. Further, N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisIn this matter, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible as her college transcript does not clearly indicate that she has 21 credits in professional planning. However, it cannot be ignored that her degree is in Planning and Public Policy and she completed 21 credits in her major. Therefore, even if all her classes in her major were not strictly professional planning classes, these courses were part of a curriculum which provided her a planning degree. Further, the list is incomplete as there is one remaining eligible and she continues to successfully provisionally serve in the subject title. The Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil Service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Therefore, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)2 and accept the appellant’s education, for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the subject examination.

This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.