S.A., CSC Docket No. 2024-1670
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 9, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2024-1670: removal from an eligible list, denied. S.A. appeals her rejection as a Police Officer candidate by Paterson and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Police Officer (M0117D).
Commission decisions · Meeting of April 9, 2025
S.A. appeals her rejection as a Police Officer candidate by Paterson and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Police Officer (M0117D).
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- April 9, 2025, item B-2
- Outcome
- Denied
- Title
- POLICE OFFICER
- Examination
- M0117D
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.
The decision
BackgroundS.A. appeals her rejection as a Police Officer candidate by Paterson and its request to remove her name from the eligible list for Police Officer (M0117D) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.
This appeal was brought before the Medical Review Panel (Panel) on November 1, 2024, which rendered its Report and Recommendation on November 1, 2024. No exceptions were filed by the parties.
The report by the Panel discusses all submitted evaluations. The Panel concluded that the test results and procedures and the behavioral record, when viewed in light of the Job Specification for Police Officer, indicated that the appellant is psychologically unfit to perform effectively the duties of the position sought, and therefore, the action of the appointing authority should be upheld. Accordingly, the Panel recommended that the appellant be removed from the subject eligible list.
CONCLUSION
The Job Specification for the title of Police Officer is the official job description for such municipal positions within the Civil Service system. The specification lists examples of work and the knowledge, skills and abilities necessary to perform the job. Examples include the ability to find practical ways of dealing with a problem, the ability to effectively use services and equipment, the ability to follow rules, the ability to put up with and handle abuse from a person or group, the ability to take the lead or take charge, knowledge of traffic laws and ordinances, and a willingness to take proper action in preventing potential accidents from occurring. Police Officers are responsible for their lives, the lives of other officers and the public. In addition, they are entrusted with lethal weapons and are in daily contact with the public. They use and maintain expensive equipment and vehicle(s) and must be able to drive safely as they often transport suspects, witnesses and other officers. A Police Officer performs searches of suspects and crime scenes and is responsible for recording all details associated with such searches. A Police Officer must be capable of responding effectively to a suicidal or homicidal situation or an abusive crowd. The job also involves the performance of routine tasks such as logging calls, recording information, labeling evidence, maintaining surveillance, patrolling assigned areas, performing inventories, maintaining uniforms and cleaning weapons.
The Civil Service Commission has reviewed the Job Specification for this title and the duties and abilities encompassed therein and finds that the psychological traits, which were identified and supported by test procedures and the behavioral record, relate adversely to the appellant’s ability to effectively perform the duties of the title. Therefore, having considered the record and the Panel’s Report and Recommendation issued thereon and having made an independent evaluation of the same, the Civil Service Commission accepts and adopts the findings and conclusions as contained in the Panel’s Report and Recommendation.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission finds that the appointing authority has met its burden of proof that S.A. is psychologically unfit to perform effectively the duties of a Police Officer and, therefore, the Civil Service Commission orders that her name be removed from the subject eligible list.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.