NJ Civil Service Navigator

J.M., CSC Docket No. 2024-764

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 9, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2024-764: removal from an eligible list, denied. J.M., represented by Stuart J. Alterman, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Sheriff’s Officer candidate by Gloucester County and its request to remove his name from the eligible list

Commission decisions · Meeting of April 9, 2025

J.M., represented by Stuart J. Alterman, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Sheriff’s Officer candidate by Gloucester County and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Sheriff’s Officer (C0219D).

Matter
Removal from an eligible list
Decided
April 9, 2025, item B-1
Outcome
Denied
Title
SHERIFF'S OFFICER
Examination
C0219D
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.

This docket at the Commission

  1. September 25, 2024, item B-3Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appellant be referred for an independent psychological evaluation.
  2. April 9, 2025, item B-1DeniedThe Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.

The decision

BackgroundJ.M., represented by Stuart J. Alterman, Esq., appeals his rejection as a Sheriff’s Officer candidate by Gloucester County and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Sheriff’s Officer (C0219D) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position.

This appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Civil Service

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.