Tiffany Colon, CSC Docket No. 2025-1709
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 13, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2025-1709: working test period, dismissed. Tiffany Colon, Judiciary Clerk 2, Judiciary, Passaic Vicinage, release at the end of the working test period, effective February 7, 2025.
Commission decisions · Meeting of August 13, 2025
Tiffany Colon, Judiciary Clerk 2, Judiciary, Passaic Vicinage, release at the end of the working test period, effective February 7, 2025.
- Matter
- Working test period
- Decided
- August 13, 2025, item A-4
- Outcome
- Dismissed
- ALJ's recommendation
- Dismiss the appeal.
- What the Commission did with it
- Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
- Employer
- Judiciary
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
BackgroundThe appeal of Tiffany Colon, Judiciary Clerk 2, Judiciary, Passaic Vicinage, release at the end of the working test period, effective February 7, 2025, was before Administrative Law Judge Kimberly K. Holmes (ALJ), who rendered her initial decision dismissing the matter on July 3, 2025. No exceptions were filed.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALwJ’s initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, the Civil Service Commission, at its meeting on August 13, 2025, affirmed the ALJ’s determination to dismiss the appeal.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission finds that the action of the appointing authority in releasing the appellant at the end of the working test period was justified. The Commission therefore upholds that action and dismisses the appeal of Tiffany Colon.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.