NJ Civil Service Navigator

Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist, CSC Docket No. 2025-2397

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 21, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2025-2397: title creation, reallocation or retitling, granted. The Division of Agency Services requests the establishment of the noncompetitive title of Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist for use in the Office of

Commission decisions · Meeting of May 21, 2025

The Division of Agency Services requests the establishment of the noncompetitive title of Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist for use in the Office of Information Technology.

Matter
Title creation, reallocation or retitling
Decided
May 21, 2025, item B-11
Outcome
Granted
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundThe Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) requests the establishment of the noncompetitive title of Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist for use in the Office of Information Technology (OIT), in accordance with N.J.A.C. 4A:3- 1.2.

In support of its request, Agency Services presents that OIT has requested the creation of the Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist title. OIT explained that this position falls under its efforts to establish roles focused on expanding the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to benefit the state of New Jersey. OIT further explained that this role will involve ensuring that AI systems are designed, deployed, and utilized in a manner that is ethical, transparent, and compliant with legal standards. The position would require a knowledge of AI technologies, algorithms, and machine learning processes as well as proficiency in data collection and analysis techniques. A strong understanding of the laws and regulations governing AI is essential, alongside knowledge of AI's impact on society, employment, equity, and cultural norms. Individuals in this role would develop and implement AI-related policies, guidelines, and ethical frameworks for AI projects; conduct ethical assessments; risk mitigation for AI systems; and design training programs to increase understanding of AI ethical issues. Additionally, duties would include conducting audits and risk analyses for AI projects, examining and updating polices to remain in compliance with ethics standards and laws, monitoring AI projects to ensure adherence to legal requirements, and developing training programs to increase understanding of AI ethical issues and best practices.

With regard to this title, Agency Services requests that it be placed in the noncompetitive division. In this regard, it contends that competitive testing for the title would not be practicable due to knowledge, skills and abilities associated with the title, as the technological advancement and specialized knowledge of AI platforms, AI technology, and data protection laws evolve at a rapid pace. Moreover, it notes that it is unlikely that the development of written examination content would keep up with, or adequately measure, the specific knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for the position. Agency Services indicates that it has provided notice and the opportunity to review the instant title creation to the applicable collective negotiations unit and that no objections were received.

Finally, Agency Services requests that the effective date for the requested action be the beginning of the first pay period following the Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) approval.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:3-3.2(a) provides that the Commission shall establish and maintain classification plans for all job titles in the career, senior executive and unclassified services. Additionally, N.J.A.C. 4A:3-3.3(a)2 provides that this agency shall implement and administer the classification plans and, in this regard, shall establish new titles, abolish unnecessary titles and consolidate titles. N.J.A.C. 4A:3- 3.6(a) states, in pertinent part, that the Commission may determine that a new title or title series is necessary.

N.J.A.C. 4A:3-1.2(c) provides that a job title may be placed in the noncompetitive division on an ongoing or interim basis when it is determined by the Commission that it is appropriate to make permanent appointments to the title and one or more of the following criteria are met:

1. Competitive testing is not practicable due to the nature of the knowledge, skills, and abilities associated with the job;

Analysis2. Certification procedures based on ranked eligible lists have not or are not likely to meet the needs of appointing authorities due to such factors as salary, geographic location, recruitment problems and working conditions;

or

3. There is a need for immediate appointments arising from a new legislative program or major agency reorganization.

Based on all of the foregoing, sufficient reason exists for the establishment of the subject title and the allocation of the Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist title to the noncompetitive division based on N.J.A.C. 4A:3-1.2(c)1. In this regard, as the Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist title specializes in a rapidly advancing technological field, it is unlikely that the development of written examination content will keep pace with, or adequately measure, the specific knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for the position. Additionally, incumbents would be required to complete a four-month working test period prior to attaining permanent status. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-5.1(b) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-5.2(b)2. Accordingly, competitive testing is impracticable for this title.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted, and the title of Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist be established. It also ordered that the title of Artificial Intelligence Policy and Ethics Specialist be allocated to the noncompetitive division of the career service. This action shall be effective May 31, 2025.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.