Shannan Brooks, CSC Docket No. 2025-2599
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 12, 2026, CSC Docket No. 2025-2599: examination scoring or administration, denied. Shannan Brooks requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Supervising Family Services Specialist 2 (PS0671K), Department of Chil
Commission decisions · Meeting of August 12, 2026
Shannan Brooks requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Supervising Family Services Specialist 2 (PS0671K), Department of Children and Families.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- August 12, 2026, item B-1
- Outcome
- Denied
- Employer
- Children and Families
- Examination
- PS0671K
- Chair at the time
- Mary Cruz, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
Appellant's argumentShannan Brooks requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Supervising Family Services Specialist 2 (PS0671K), Department of Children and Families
BackgroundBy way of background, the subject examination was announced open in pertinent part, to employees in the competitive division who possessed one year of continuous permanent service and were currently serving in the competitive title of Family Service Specialist 1 and Family Service Specialist 1 Bilingual in Spanish and English; or to employees who possessed one year of permanent service in any competitive title and who met the open-competitive requirements and who met the listed education and experience requirements as of the May 21, 2025, closing date. The eligible list of 442 names1 promulgated on April 23, 2026, and expires on April 22, 2028.
Appellant's argumentIn an appeal submitted in May 2025 to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant argues that she was unaware of the examination as the appointing authority did not send out any notification of the examination to her. The appellant also asserts that since she was out of the office for most of the filing period,2 she was unable to apply for the announcement that was circulated.
BackgroundAgency records indicate that 627 applicants applied for the subject examination. 2 The appellant indicates that she was teleworking on May 1, 2025 and May 2, 2025, and was then out of the office from May 5, 2025 through May 21, 2025.
In response, the appointing authority confirms that the announcement was posted prominently in the common area of the work location, as well as on its intranet and the Civil Service Commission (Commission) website. Additionally, the appointing authority notes that as the appellant did not possess one year of permanent service as a Family Services Specialist 1 or Family Services Specialist 1 Bilingual in Spanish and English, it was not required to provide the appellant with personal notification. See N.J.A.C 4A:4-21.
Agency records indicate that the appellant received a regular appointment to the title of Family Services Specialist 1, effective September 21, 2024; and a regular appointment to the title of Family Services Specialist 2, effective April 21, 2012.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) provides, in pertinent part, that applications for examinations shall be submitted no later than 4:00 P.M. on the announced application filing deadline. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(b) provides that in order to notify all employees of promotional opportunities, promotional examination announcements shall be posted on, and applications shall be made available through, the Commission web site and may also be made available through the web sites of affected appointing authorities. If an affected appointing authority does not maintain or utilize a web site, promotional examination announcements shall be conspicuously posted by the affected appointing authority at all geographic locations within the unit scope (in State service) or department (in local service) to which the examination is open. Appointing authorities shall also ensure the notification by electronic or other means of all eligibles of the promotional examination announcement. Appointing authorities shall maintain a record of promotional examination announcement postings and the notification of eligibles of the announcement. Finally, N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.4(c) provides that the appellant has the burden of proof.
AnalysisIn this matter, agency records indicate that the appellant did not possess one year of continuous permanent service as either a Family Service Specialist 1 or Family Service Specialist 1 Bilingual in Spanish and English, as of the May 21, 2025, closing date. In this regard, agency records reveal that the appellant only received a regular appointment to the title of Family Services Specialist 1, effective September 21, 2024. Thereby providing her with only eight months of permanent service as a Family Service Specialist 1 as of the subject closing date. Consequently, pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(b) the appellant was not required to receive personal notification. Moreover, agency records indicate that the subject announcement was posted on the appointing authority and the Commission’s websites, as well as the work location, as required by N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(b). Therefore, as the appointing authority was not required to provide the appellant with personal notification, the appellant has failed to establish good cause to relax the rules and permit a late application in this matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.