Anastasia Taboada, CSC Docket No. 2019-1546
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1546: examination eligibility, granted. Anastasia Taboada appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assist
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 6, 2019
Anastasia Taboada appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assistant (PC1299W), Atlantic County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- February 6, 2019, item B-16
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- MANAGEMENT ASSISTANT
- Employer
- Atlantic County
- Examination
- PC1299W
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-016 02-06-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundAnastasia Taboada appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Management Assistant (PC1299W), Atlantic County.
The education requirement for the subject examination was a Bachelor’s degree. The experience requirements were one year of experience performing complex administrative support work which must have included the interpretation, verification and/or application of department/agency rules, regulations, policies and procedures by the May 21, 2018 closing date. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a). Applicants who did not possess the required education could substitute additional experience on a year for year basis with 30 semester hour credits being equal to one year of experience. As the appellant, the only applicant, was found ineligible, the examination was cancelled on December 14, 2018.
Personnel records indicate that the appellant was provisionally serving in the subject title from February 2018 to the May 21, 2018 closing date, a Keyboarding Clerk 3 from June 2016 to February 2018 and in various Clerk titles from August 2012 to June 2016. Agency Services credited the appellant with two years and six months of experience based on her 67 college credits and four months of experience for her provisional service in the subject title, but determined that she lacked two years and six months of experience.
The record demonstrates that the appellant performed applicable out-of-title work as a Keyboarding Clerk 3 and in various Clerk titles, as, in support of her appeal, her supervisor describes how and why the appellant primarily performed the required out-of-title duties for more than two and one-half years. Further, the appointing authority confirms that it authorized the appellant’s out-of-title work due to business necessity. Additionally, the examination was cancelled and the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title. Accordingly, in this matter, the Civil Service Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c) to accept the appellant’s out-of-title work experience for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the examination.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, the cancellation of the examination be rescinded and Anastasia Taboada’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.