NJ Civil Service Navigator

Joseph Pirozek, CSC Docket No. 2019-1995

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of March 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1995: examination eligibility, granted. Joseph Pirozek appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Recreation Supervisor (P

Commission decisions · Meeting of March 6, 2019

Joseph Pirozek appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Recreation Supervisor (PC1753W), Ocean County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
March 6, 2019, item B-25
Outcome
Granted
Title
RECREATION SUPERVISOR
Employer
Ocean County
Examination
PC1753W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-025 03-06-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundJoseph Pirozek appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Recreation Supervisor (PC1753W), Ocean County.

The education requirement for the subject announcement was a Bachelor’s degree. The experience requirements were two years of experience in recreation work involving the planning, promotion, development, and supervision of a recreation program. Two applicants applied to the announcement and one was found eligible. The list promulgated on January 24, 2019 and expires January 23, 2022.

On his application, the appellant indicated that he possessed a Bachelor’s degree. Additionally, he indicated that he was provisionally serving in the subject title from August 2017 to the June 21, 2018 closing date, a Recreation Program Coordinator from October 2012 to August 2017, and a Recreation Leader from November 2005 to October 2012. Agency Services credited the appellant for his education and having 11 months of experience based on his provisional service in the subject title, but determined that he lacked one year and one month of experience since he did not indicate supervisory experience as a Recreation Program Coordinator and Recreation Leader, and if he did, this would be out-of-title experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant describes various facilities that are used for recreation where he was involved in the planning and overseeing the development of these facilities.

CONLCUSION

BackgroundA review of the appellant’s application indicates that although as a Recreation Leader he was not a supervisor, he was assisting in the planning, promoting, and developing the same recreation programs that he now supervises while serving provisionally in the subject title. Additionally, he has accrued an additional eight months of supervisory experience since the closing date. Further, the list is incomplete as it contains only one eligible. Therefore, the Civil Service Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) which provides that all requirements for promotional examinations must be met by the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit the appellant to the subject examination.

This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and Joseph Pirozek’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.