Cristine Chickadel, CSC Docket No. 2019-2570
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 22, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-2570: examination eligibility, granted. Cristine Chickadel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for Program Analys
Commission decisions · Meeting of May 22, 2019
Cristine Chickadel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open- competitive examination for Program Analyst (C0773W), Atlantic County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- May 22, 2019, item B-5
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- PROGRAM ANALYST
- Employer
- Atlantic County
- Examination
- C0773W, C0847W
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-005 05-22-19 Corrected.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundCristine Chickadel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open-competitive examination for Program Analyst (C0847W), Atlantic County.
The education requirement for the subject examination was a Bachelor’s degree. The experience requirements were one year of experience in the review, analysis and evaluation of operating programs in an agency or organization by the August 6, 2018 closing date. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b)2. A total of six individuals applied and one was found eligible. Certification OL190245 was issued containing the name of the one eligible and its disposition is due June 11, 2019. The list expires on March 6, 2022.
The appellant’s application indicates that she possesses a Bachelor’s degree. Additionally, her application indicates that she was a Community Service Worker from August 2017 to July 2018. Agency Services credited the appellant for her Bachelor’s degree, but determined that she lacked the required one year of experience.
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(g) provides that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) can accept clarifying information in eligibility appeals. For example, information submitted on appeal pertaining to duties in a given position that expands or enlarges information previously submitted is considered clarifying and is accepted.
BackgroundThe appointing authority clarifies that the appellant performed applicable duties as a Community Service Worker out of business necessity since the appellant was hired in August 2017 to the present. The Commission reviewed the appellant’s verified experience and is satisfied it meets the requirements of the title under test. Further, the Commission notes that the list is incomplete as there is currently only one name on the list. Moreover, the appellant continues to perform the required duties.1 Therefore, the Commission finds that the appellant has sufficiently clarified that she has been performing the required duties for more than the required time by the closing date.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and Cristine Chickadel’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.