Christine Allen, CSC Docket No. 2019-3029
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 22, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-3029: examination eligibility, granted. Christine Allen appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Assistant County
Commission decisions · Meeting of May 22, 2019
Christine Allen appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Assistant County Tax Administrator (PC2475W), Ocean County.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- May 22, 2019, item B-4
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- ASSISTANT COUNTY TAX ADMINISTRATOR
- Employer
- Ocean County
- Examination
- PC2475W
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-004 05-22-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundChristine Allen appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Assistant County Tax Administrator (PC2475W), Ocean County.
The subject promotional examination had a closing date of October 22, 2018 and was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in any competitive title and who met the announced requirements. Those requirements included possession of a current and valid Tax Assessor certificate issued by the New Jersey Division of Taxation, three years of experience in making real estate appraisals or property tax assessments of residential, commercial, and/or industrial real property. The appellant was found to be below the minimum requirements in experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was cancelled on April 28, 2019.
On her application, the appellant indicated possession of a current and valid Tax Assessor certificate, and she listed three positions, provisional Assistant County Tax Administrator, Senior Field Representative, County Board Taxation and Field Representative, County Board Taxation. She was credited with one year, six months of experience in her provisional position and was found to be lacking six months of required experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant argues that her experience as a Senior Field Representative, County Board Taxation and Field Representative, County Board
Taxation is applicable. In support, the Ocean County Tax Administrator states that the appellant was conducting inspections and investigations to establish and make tax assessments for tax appeal purposes while in the titles Senior Field Representative, County Board Taxation and Field Representative, County Board Taxation.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date.
N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that the Civil Service Commission may relax the rules for good cause in a particular situation, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisIn the instant matter, the appellant was found to be lacking six months of qualifying experience. It is noted that qualifying experience has the announced experience as the primary focus. The amount of time, and the importance of the duty, determines if it is the primary focus. The appellant’s positions on her application of Senior Field Representative, County Board Taxation and Field Representative, County Board Taxation have field investigations of real estate as the primary focus. As such, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible for the subject examination. Nevertheless, the appellant has accrued an additional six months in her provisional position, and the examination had been cancelled. As such, good cause exists to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a), and accept the appellant’s experience after the closing date and admit her to the examination.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.