Kelly Napolitano, CSC Docket No. 2019-3430
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 12, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-3430: certification or appointment, granted. The Township of Brick requests the revival of the list for Clerk 4 (PM2336T) to allow for the retroactive permanent appointment of Kelly Napolitano, effective January 1, 2019.
Commission decisions · Meeting of June 12, 2019
The Township of Brick requests the revival of the list for Clerk 4 (PM2336T) to allow for the retroactive permanent appointment of Kelly Napolitano, effective January 1, 2019.
- Matter
- Certification or appointment
- Decided
- June 12, 2019, item B-53
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- CLERK 4
- Examination
- PM2336T
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-053 06-12-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundThe Township of Brick requests the revival of the list for Clerk 4 (PM2336T) to allow for the retroactive permanent appointment of Kelly Napolitano, effective January 1, 2019.
By way of background, the examination for Clerk 4 (PM2336T) was announced with a closing date of November 21, 2015. The resulting eligible list of five names, including Napolitano as the second ranked non-veteran eligible promulgated on March 17, 2016 and expired on March 16, 2019. Two certifications were issued which resulted in the appointment of the first and third ranked non- veteran eligibles.
On appeal, the appointing authority argues that it provisionally appointed Napolitano to the title of Clerk 4 effective January 1, 2019. However, it notes that it did not record the appointment in CAMPS until March 20, 2019. It maintains that as the subject eligible list had expired on March 16, 2019, it was unable to request a certification to appoint Napolitano. Therefore, it requests that the subject eligible list be revived and Napolitano receive a retroactive permanent appointment effective January 1, 2019
The Division of Agency Services indicates its agreement with the appointing authority’s request to revive the subject eligible list, to allow for the appointment of Napolitano.
CONCLUSION
N.J.S.A. 11A:4-6 and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-3.4 provide that an eligible list may be revived in order to implement a court order or decision of the Civil Service Commission (Commission) in the event of a successful appeal instituted during the life of a list, to correct an administrative error, or for other good cause. Additionally, N.J.A.C. 4A:4-1.10(c) states that an individual may receive a retroactive date of appointment to correct an administrative error, for an administrative delay or for other good cause.
In the instant matter, the subject eligible list expired on March 16, 2019. Therefore, once Napolitano’s provisional appointment was recorded in CAMPS, the Commission initiated promotional examination procedures.1 However, had the appointing authority timely recorded Napolitano’s January 1, 2019 provisional appointment in CAMPS or had the appointing authority requested a certification prior to the expiration of PM2336T eligible list, Napolitano would have been reachable for appointment. Consequently, good cause exists to revive the subject eligible list so that Napolitano may be appointed to the title of Clerk 4. Moreover, upon her successful completion of a current working test period, Napolitano shall be provided with a retroactive date of regular appointment to January 1, 2019, for salary step placement and seniority based purposes only
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted and the eligible list for Clerk 4 (PM2336T), Township of Brick be revived to effectuate the appointment of Kelly Napolitano. It is also ordered that upon successful completion of a current working test period she be given a retroactive date of permanent appointment of January 1, 2019, for salary step placement and seniority based purposes only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.