NJ Civil Service Navigator

Juan Hernandez, CSC Docket No. 2020-1038

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-1038: examination eligibility, granted. Juan Hernandez appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services, which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Senior Food S

Commission decisions · Meeting of November 6, 2019

Juan Hernandez appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services, which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Senior Food Service Worker (PC0507A), Essex County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
November 6, 2019, item B-24
Outcome
Granted
Title
SENIOR FOOD SERVICE WORKER
Employer
Essex County
Examination
PC0507A
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-024 11-06-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundJuan Hernandez appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Senior Food Service Worker (PC0507A), Essex County.

The subject promotional examination had a closing date of April 22, 2019 and was open to employees in the non-competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in the title Food Service Worker, and who met the announced requirements. Those requirements were one year of experience in general unskilled kitchen or food service work. The appellant was found to be below the minimum requirements in experience. One applicant appears on the eligible list, which has been certified, but no appointments have yet been made.

On his application, the appellant listed one position, Senior Food Service Worker from October 2018 to the April 2019 closing date. Official records confirm this appointment and indicate that he was a Food Service Worker from March 2008 to October 2018. He was credited with seven months of experience for the one position on his application and was found to be lacking five months of required experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant explains that he was as Food Service Worker from March 2008 to his provisional appointment in the subject title, and he lists the duties of his positions.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date.

N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that the Civil Service Commission may relax the rules for good cause in a particular situation, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, the appellant was found to be lacking five months of qualifying experience. The appellant listed only one positions on his application, and as such, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible for the subject examination. Nevertheless, the appellant had accrued at least an additional five months of applicable experience in his position as a Food Service Worker. He serves as a provisional in the subject title, the list is incomplete, and there is only one candidate on the eligible list. As such, good cause exists to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a), and accept the appellant’s additional experience and admit him to the examination.

On a final note, the On-Line Application System User’s Guide cautions applicants to carefully review the application to ensure that it is complete and accurate before submitting, and to complete the application in detail. It states that failure to complete the application properly may cause the applicant to be declared ineligible. The instructions under the experience portion of the applications advise applicants to provide all employment information (not just current employment information), and if they have multiple positions, they need to make sure that they provide each one separately. The appellant should follow these instructions and properly complete any future applications for examinations.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.