NJ Civil Service Navigator

Timothy Loving, CSC Docket No. 2020-1079

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 15, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1079: examination scoring or administration, dismissed as untimely. Timothy Loving requests a make-up of the physical performance portion of the examination for Fire Fighter (M1807W), Bordentown Township Fire District 2.

Commission decisions · Meeting of January 15, 2020

Timothy Loving requests a make-up of the physical performance portion of the examination for Fire Fighter (M1807W), Bordentown Township Fire District 2.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
January 15, 2020, item B-58
Outcome
Dismissed as untimely
Title
FIRE FIGHTER
Examination
M1807W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-058 01-15-20.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be dismissed as untimely.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentTimothy Loving requests a make-up of the physical performance portion (PPT) of the examination for Fire Fighter (M1807W), Bordentown Township Fire District 2.

BackgroundThe appellant was scheduled to take the PPT on September 11, 2019 and did not appear. In an appeal postmarked October 15, 2019, the appellant explains that he did not open the scheduling email on a computer, but did so on a phone, and did not note the date, time and location. On September 7, 2019, he opened the email on a borrowed laptop and realized that he would not make the test date of September 11, 2019, as he was driving across country at the time.

CONCLUSION

RuleAt the outset, N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1(b) states that, unless a different time period is stated, an appeal must be filed within 20 days after either the appellant has notice or should reasonably have known of the decision, situation, or action being appealed. On the attachment provided, which is presumably what the appellant could see on his phone, it states that make-ups requests must be submitted in writing with supporting documentation within five days of receipt of the notice. The appellant was sent a notice on August 26, 2019 and did not file an appeal until October 15, 2019. As such, this appeal is clearly untimely.

AnalysisPursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9(a), Make-up examinations for open competitive and general promotional testing may be authorized for the following reasons:

1. Error by the Civil Service Commission or appointing authority;

2. Serious illness or disability of the candidate on the test date, provided the candidate submits a doctor's certificate specifying that the candidate was not able to take the test on that day for medical reasons;

3. Documented serious illness or death in the candidate's immediate family;

4. Natural disaster;

5. Prior vacation or travel plans outside of New Jersey or any contiguous state, which cannot be reasonably changed, as evidenced by a sworn statement and relevant documentation;

6. When required for certain persons returning from military service (see N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.6A); and

7. Other valid reasons.

Although this matter is being denied solely on the basis that it is untimely, this request is also without merit. Across the top of the attachment provided, it states, “FF PPT NOTICE 091119-10A…” This includes the date of the examination, September 11, 2019, which the appellant could have seen. Also, computers are ubiquitous, and the appellant did not indicate that he did not have Internet access or access to a working computer while he was away. The appellant provides no proof or evidence of his travel, and does not explain why he did not request a make- up in a timely fashion.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be dismissed as untimely.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.