N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1 Filing of appeals
N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1, Filing of appeals. All appeals to the Civil Service Commission shall be in writing, signed by the person appealing (appellant) or his or her representative and include the rea Full text with 3 recorded amendments, 70 citing decisions, cited by 6 other rules.
Current through New Jersey Register, Vol. 58 No. 14, July 20, 2026. Reviewed as of July 26, 2026.
This is an annotated mirror, not the official publication. Verify against the Civil Service Commission before relying on it.
In plain language
Twenty days, running from the earlier of two things: when you had notice of the decision, situation or action, or when you reasonably should have known of it. That second limb can expire a deadline on somebody who never received anything. It is the residual rule: 4A:2-1.7 sends every appeal without a procedure of its own here, and a period stated elsewhere displaces it. The appeal must be in writing, signed by you or your representative, and state the reason for it and the specific relief wanted. A fee applies under 4A:2-1.8 unless the appeal is an exempt type. Expect no hearing: appeals are decided on the written record unless a hearing is required by law, by this chapter or by the layoff rules at 4A:8, or unless the Commission finds a material and controlling dispute of fact that only a hearing can resolve. On a written record appeal you serve your materials on every other party and may read the file at the Commission or request copies. Representation may be by an attorney, an authorized union representative, or an authorized appointing authority representative. Failure to supply information the Commission requests may result in dismissal.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team from the text of N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1. It is a description of the rule, not the rule itself, and not legal advice.
Appeal deadlines, and what happens if you miss one
Twenty days is the default, and the phrase that does the work is the one people skip. An appeal must be filed within 20 days after either the appellant has notice of the decision, situation or action being appealed, or should reasonably have known of it. The second half means the clock can start before anything arrives in your hands. Days here means calendar days unless a rule says otherwise, so weekends are inside the count.
The default only applies where no different time period is stated, and Title 4A states different ones constantly. A major discipline appeal runs 20 days from your receipt of the Final Notice, and receipt on another date by your attorney or union representative does not move it. A minor discipline or grievance appeal in State service runs 20 days from the conclusion of departmental proceedings. Layoff appeals run 20 days from receipt of the final notice of status. Disqualification and other examination related appeals run 20 days from notice, and have to be filed with the Commission representative named on the notice rather than sent anywhere convenient. Medical or psychological disqualification appeals run 20 days, with a further 90 calendar days from filing to submit a report from a professional of your own choosing. Examination items and scoring are the outlier: five business days after the examination to arrange a review, then five business days to challenge a keyed answer, and a challenge to how the examination was administered has to be filed in writing at the examination site on the day.
Filing is more than sending a letter. The appeal must be in writing, signed by you or your representative, and state both the reason for the appeal and the specific relief requested. A $20.00 processing fee applies to most appeals, and an appeal received without one is not processed unless you pay it, or prove an exemption, within the time set by written notice from the Commission. Veterans who have established preference are exempt, as are appellants receiving General Assistance, Work First New Jersey benefits or Supplemental Security Income, on documentation. Several categories carry no fee at all, including classification, job reevaluation, list extension and revival, and layoff rights appeals. You also have to supply any further information requested, and failure to do so can end the appeal.
Most appeals are then decided on the written record. A hearing happens only where one is required by law, by the appeals chapter or by the layoff chapter, or where the Commission finds a material and controlling dispute of fact that only a hearing can resolve. In a written record appeal each party serves copies of everything on the others, and you may review the file at the Commission or ask for copies. You may be represented by an attorney, an authorised union representative or an authorised appointing authority representative.
Miss the deadline and this section offers nothing. Three things elsewhere might. Where the appointing authority never gave you a Final Notice of Disciplinary Action, the major discipline rules let you appeal directly to the Commission within a reasonable time instead. Within 45 days of receiving a decision, a party may petition for reconsideration, but only by showing new evidence or additional information not presented originally that would change the outcome and explaining why it was not presented, or by showing a clear material error. And the Commission may relax its rules for good cause in a particular situation, on notice to affected parties, to effectuate the statutory purposes. None of those is an extension mechanism, and what counts as should reasonably have known is not defined.
One more thing worth checking before filing anywhere: the rules keep a list of specific appeal procedures, covering awards, classification, discipline, discrimination, list removal on medical or psychological grounds, examinations, grievances, layoffs, overtime, performance review, reprisals, resignations, salary reevaluation and supplemental compensation on retirement. Anything not on that list is filed under this section.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team. Every statement here traces to the rules cited on this page. It is not legal advice, and a collective agreement may change how these rules apply to you.
(a) All appeals to the Civil Service Commission shall be in writing, signed by the person appealing (appellant) or his or her representative and include the reason for the appeal and the specific relief requested. See N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.8 for appeal processing fees. #
(b) Unless a different time period is stated, an appeal must be filed within 20 days after either the appellant has notice or should reasonably have known of the decision, situation, or action being appealed. #
(c) The appellant must provide any additional information that is requested, and failure to provide such information may result in dismissal of the appeal. #
(d) Except where a hearing is required by law, this chapter or N.J.A.C. 4A:8, or where the Civil Service Commission finds that a material and controlling dispute of fact exists that can only be resolved by a hearing, an appeal will be reviewed on a written record. In written record appeals: #
1. Each party must serve copies of all materials submitted on all other parties; and #
2. A party may either review the file at the Civil Service Commission during business hours, or request copies of file materials. #
(e) A party in an appeal may be represented by an attorney, authorized union representative, or authorized appointing authority representative. See N.J.A.C. 1:1-5.4 for contested case representation at the Office of Administrative Law. #
Amendment history
Rule numbers, effective dates and New Jersey Register citations as published. 3 recorded changes.
- AmendedR.2015 d.18647 N.J.R. 1689(a); 47 N.J.R. 2966(a); 52 N.J.R. 971(a)
- AmendedR.2011 d.17343 N.J.R. 470(a); 43 N.J.R. 1419(b)
- AmendedR.1992 d.41424 N.J.R. 2491(a); 24 N.J.R. 3716(a)
How this rule has been applied
70 decisions have cited N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1. The list below is citations to those decisions, not the decisions. We have not written summaries for this section. A citation with no summary is deliberate: we do not paraphrase a decision we have not read. Nothing here is legal advice.
Appellate Division (1)
- Honachefsky v. New Jersey Civil Service Comm'n174 N.J.Super. 539; 417 A.2d 67
Superior Court (3)
- Matter of Tavani264 N.J.Super. 154; 624 A.2d 75
- Matter of Allen262 N.J.Super. 438; 621 A.2d 87
- Matter of Wiggins242 N.J.Super. 342; 576 A.2d 932
Civil Service Commission final determinations (63)
- In re Kurapka, Greystone Park Psych. Hosp., Dep’t of Health, CSC Docket No. 2024-16392024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 338Docket 2024-1639
- In re Kurapka, Greystone Park Psych. Hosp., Dep't of Health, CSC Docket No. 2024-16392024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 338Docket 2024-1639
- In re T.T., Fire Fighter (M1873W), CSC Docket Nos. 2023-2197 and 2024-16262024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 251Docket 2023-2197 and 2024-1626
- In re Fielding, Police Officer, Phillipsburg, CSC Docket No. 2024-1362024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 34; 2024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 130Docket 2024-136
- In re S.L., Dep't of Children & Families, CSC Docket No. 2024-10092024 N.J. CSC LEXIS 29Docket 2024-1009
- In re M.S. et al., Police Sergeant (PM5120N), Jersey City, CSC Docket Nos. 2023-331 and 2023-718 (Consolidated)2023 N.J. CSC LEXIS 239Docket 2023-331 and 2023-718
- In re Gogan, Sheriff's Officer Lieutenant (PC1556A), Mercer Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2022-182021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 499Docket 2022-18
- In re J.H., Corr. Police Officer (S9988A), Dep't of Corr., CSC Docket No. 2021-1022021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 419Docket 2021-102
- In re D.A.R., City of Jersey City, CSC Docket No. 2021-13082021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 366Docket 2021-1308
- In the Matter of Amit Shah, Program Specialist 4, Social/Human Serv. (PS2701K), Div. of Dev. Disabilities, CSC Docket No. 2021-19772021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 356Docket 2021-1977
- In re Hartnett, Pennsauken, CSC Docket No. 2021-16522021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 246Docket 2021-1652
- In re Blount, Cnty. Corr. Police Lieutenant (PC2070U), Essex Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2021-4692021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 104Docket 2021-469
- In re T.D.E., Fire Fighter (M1844W), City of Jersey City, CSC Docket No. 2020-15322021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 4Docket 2020-1532
- In re J.D., Police Officer (S9999U), City of Bayonne, CSC Docket No. 2020-19992020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1027Docket 2020-1999
- In re Marroquin, Paterson, CSC Docket No. 2020-21982020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 958Docket 2020-2198
- In re Kandl, Union Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2019-26692020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 188Docket 2019-2669
- In re J.M, Cnty. Corr. Officer (S9999U), Morris Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2018-24022020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 162Docket 2018-2402
- In re Bradley, Fire Fighter (M1860W), Ocean City, CSC Docket No. 2020-10672020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 42Docket 2020-1067
- In re Loving, Fire Fighter (M1807W), Bordentown Twp. Fire Dist. 2, CSC Docket No. 2020-10792020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 14Docket 2020-1079
- In re Josey, Police Officer (S9999R), North Brunswick, CSC Docket No. 2020-6852019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1143Docket 2020-685
- In re D.O., Fire Fighter (M1557T), N. Hudson Fire & Rescue, CSC Docket No. 2019-8942019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 645Docket 2019-894
- In re Santiago, Assistant Dir. of Fin. (M0716V), Borough of Pt. Pleasant, CSC Docket No. 2019-14682019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 190Docket 2019-1468
- In re Miller, Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket No. 2019-12112019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 169Docket 2019-1211
- In re Frazier, Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket No. 2018-23322019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 137Docket 2018-2332
- In re Whittick, Cnty. Corr. Sergeant (PC2075U), Camden Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2019-14902019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 150Docket 2019-1490
- In re Deputy Police Chief (PM0511W), Jersey City, CSC Docket No. 2019-9332018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 826Docket 2019-933
- In re Larmony, Fire Fighter (M1540T), Irvington2018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 748
- In re J.M., Police Officer (S9999R), Ocean City, CSC Docket No. 2017-19702018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 628Docket 2017-1970
- In re Alemany et al., Fire Captain (PM1051V), Paterson, CSC Docket Nos. 2018-36002018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 664Docket 2018-3600
- In re Mueller, N.J. Veterans Mem'l Home at Menlo Park, CSC Docket No. 2018-2902018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 655Docket 2018-290
- In re Littlejohn, Dep't of Health, CSC Docket No. 2018-2402018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 615Docket 2018-240
- In re Lagana, Admin. Assistant 2 (PS4564P), Dep't of Law & Pub. Safety, CSC Docket No. 2018-36152018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 614Docket 2018-3615
- In re Dressler et al., Fire Officer 1 (PM5205N), Jersey City, CSC Docket Nos. 2018-2492018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 566Docket 2018-249
- In re N.B., Dep't of Lab. & Workforce Dev., CSC Docket No. 2018-14672018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 366Docket 2018-1467
- In re Lemieux, Trenton Psychiatric Hosp., CSC Docket No. 2018-9772018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 245Docket 2018-977
- In re Breeden, Fire Investigator (S0146T), Dep't of Cmty. Affairs, CSC Docket No. 2017-39542018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 210Docket 2017-3954
- In re Samler, Police Officer (S9999U), Point Pleasant, CSC Docket No. 2018-5392018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 182Docket 2018-539
- In re Wallace, Twp. of Willingboro, CSC Docket No. 2018-2972017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 812Docket 2018-297
- In re Slimmer, Corr. Lieutenant (PS6072I), Dep't of Corrs., CSC Docket No. 2017-23422017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 672Docket 2017-2342
- In re Rosenthal et al., Assistant Admin. Supervisor of Income Maint. (PC2607T), Burlington Cnty. Bd. of Social Servs., CSC Docket Nos. 2017-1913 and 2017-1872 (Consolidated)2017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 589Docket 2017-1913 and 2017-1872
- In re Abazie, Dep't of Human Servs., CSC Docket No. 2017-21682017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 528Docket 2017-2168
- In re Hammad, Entry Level Law Enforcement Examination (S9999U), CSC Docket No. 2017-21152017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 410Docket 2017-2115
- In re Schulman, Lakewood Twp., CSC Docket No. 2016-34982017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 324Docket 2016-3498
- In re Landers, Village of Ridgewood, CSC Docket No. 2016-6582017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 350Docket 2016-658
- In re Dagayday, Dir. of Nursing Servs. 1, Developmental Disabilities (Special), Dep't of Human Servs., CSC Dkt. No. 2017-12982017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 298
- In re Durham, Union Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2017-882017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 250Docket 2017-88
- In re V.W., Dep't of Human Servs., CSC Docket No. 2017-962017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 227Docket 2017-96
- In re Cobbertt, Dep't of the Treasury, CSC Dkt. No. 2016-42792017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 69
- In re Brogna, Deputy Cnty. Emergency Mgmt. Coordinator (C0699P), Monmouth Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2015-32732015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 193Docket 2015-3273
- In re P.O., Dep't of Community Affairs, CSC Docket No. 2015-18652015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 142Docket 2015-1865
- In re Reddy, Dep't of Human Servs., CSC Docket No. 2014-23302015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 170Docket 2014-2330
- In re Barnett, Gloucester Cnty., CSC Dkt. No. 2014-18902014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 797
- In re Vogt, et al., Jersey City, CSC Docket Nos. 2011-4505 to 2011-4512 (Consolidated) (On Remand)2014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 488Docket 2011-4505
- In re Tisch, Program Support Specialist 1, Assistance Programs (S2408N), Statewide, CSC Dkt. No. 2014-14952014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 886
- In re Schisani, et al., Battalion Fire Chief (PM0142P), City of Hoboken, CSC Docket No. 2014-1072014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 86Docket 2014-107
- In re Tysen Graham, Dep't. of Human Serv., CSC DKT. No. 2014-6582013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1089
- In re James Anderson, Twp. of Berkeley, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-10332013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 814
- Fire Fighter (M2320H), Asbury Park, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-5302013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 634
- In re Lynn Brzozowski and Kimberly Sampson, Jersey City Sch. Dist. CSC Dkt. Nos. 2012-31822013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 535
- In re Jack Laurie, Department of Community Affairs, CSC Docket No. 2013-5592013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 202Docket 2013-559
- Clark v. New Jersey Dep't of Agriculture1 N.J.A.R. 3151980
- Maycheck v. Atlantic City Housing Authority97 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 182
- Pryor v. Township of Morristown92 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 18
Office of Administrative Law initial decisions (2)
- In re Rowe, City of E. Orange2008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1511Docket CSV07535-07
- In re Drayton2005 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1250Docket CSV 2151-05
Other decisions (1)
- Court denied reconsideration of its denial of county employers' motion for summary judgment on employee's claim that her due process rights were violated because she was not provided a prompt post-deprivation hearing concerning her suspension, as required by N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.5 because even if N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.5 did not apply and the employee had the general right to appeal the appropriateness of her suspension under N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1, the employee could not reasonably be expected to know which appeal process applied to her suspension as she was never advised whether or not the suspension was disciplinary in nature, and without that information, the employee could not have known that she should look to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-1.1 for the proper appeal procedure as opposed to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.5. Bentley v. Atl. County2008
This rule points to
Rules that point here
- 4A:2-1.7 Specific appeals
- 4A:2-6.1 Resignation in good standing
- 4A:4-4.5 Certifications limited to persons of a particular sex, religion, or national origin
- 4A:6-5.3 PAR use and review: State service
- 4A:7-3.2 Model procedures for internal complaints alleging discrimination in the workplace
- 4A:8-2.6 Appeals