NJ Civil Service Navigator

Diana Bauer, CSC Docket No. 2020-15

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 14, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-15: examination eligibility, granted. Diana Bauer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Executive Secretarial Assi

Commission decisions · Meeting of August 14, 2019

Diana Bauer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Executive Secretarial Assistant (PS8865H), Department of Health.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
August 14, 2019, item B-15
Outcome
Granted
Employer
Health and Senior Services
Examination
PS8865H
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 08-14-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundDiana Bauer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Executive Secretarial Assistant (PS8865H), Department of Health.

The examination at issue was announced with specific requirements that had to be met as of the December 21, 2018 closing date. The experience requirements were six years of experience in secretarial and administrative clerical work. The appellant was the only applicant and the examination was canceled due to a lack of qualified candidates.

On her application, the appellant indicated that she possesses a Bachelor’s degree. Additionally, she indicated that she was an Administrative Assistant 3 from August 2015 to the December 21, 2018 closing date, a Secretarial Assistant 3 from January 2015 to August 2015, a Principal Clerk Typist from December 2012 to January 2015, and a Senior Clerk Typist from January 2005 to December 2012. Personnel records indicate that she was provisionally serving in the subject title from September 2018 to the closing date, an Administrative Assistant 3 from August 2015 to September 2018, a Secretarial Assistant 3 from January 2015 to August 2015, a Principal Clerk Typist from December 2012 to January 2015, and a Senior Clerk Typist from January 2005 to December 2012. Agency Services did not credit the appellant with any applicable experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant explains how she performed both secretarial and administrative clerical duties since 2012 as either an Administrative Assistant 3, a Secretarial Assistant 3, or a Principal Clerk Typist. Additionally, she submits her college transcripts to show that she possesses an Associate’s degree in Education and a Bachelor’s degree in Sociology. Further, the appellant submits letters from her superiors to confirm that she performed the required duties as an Administrative Assistant 3.

CONLCUSION

AnalysisIn this matter, the appellant’s supervisors have confirmed that she has been successfully performing the required duties since August 2015 as an Administrative Assistant 3. Further, a review of the appellant’s application and appeal indicates that she has performed secretarial and/or clerical duties since 2005 while serving in various clerical titles. Additionally, it cannot be ignored that the appellant has earned a Bachelor’s degree, which provides her the background to successfully perform administrative clerical duties, which are more complex than standard clerical duties and involve the frequent exercise of independent judgment. Moreover, she has accrued an additional six months of experience since the closing date. Finally, the list was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates. Therefore, the Civil Service Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) which provides that all requirements for promotional examinations must be met by the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit the appellant to the subject examination.

This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and Diana Bauer’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.