Regina Angeline, CSC Docket No. 2020-1925
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 26, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-1925: matter, granted. Regina Angeline petitions the Civil Service Commission to allow her to change her work location preference area for Rehabilitation Counselor, Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide.
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 26, 2020
Regina Angeline petitions the Civil Service Commission to allow her to change her work location preference area for Rehabilitation Counselor, Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide.
- Matter
- Not classified
- Decided
- February 26, 2020, item B-16
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- REHABILITATION COUNSELOR MENTAL HEALTH
- Examination
- S0846V
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-016 02-26-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this petition be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundRegina Angeline petitions the Civil Service Commission (Commission) to allow her to change her work location preference area for Rehabilitation Counselor, Mental Health (S0846V), Statewide.
The examination at issue had a November 21, 2017 closing date. On her application, the petitioner indicated that her work location preference areas (preference areas) for employment were Camden and Essex Counties. A total of 64 individuals applied for the examination. The petitioner took the examination on September 5, 2019, which resulted in a list of 22 eligibles that expires on October 2, 2022. The petitioner was tied as the 6th ranked eligible. Certification OS190562 was issued for positions in Morris County, certifications OS190563 and OS190565 were issued for positions in Camden County, and certifications OS190564 and OS200109 were issued for positions at Trenton Psychiatric Hospital in Mercer County. It is noted that three eligibles were appointed on OS190564. The certification notice for OS200109 was issued on February 18, 2020 and its disposition is due May 10, 2020. There are currently five names remaining on the eligible list who have indicated Mercer County as a preference area and these eligibles are listed on certification OS200109. Agency records indicate that there are currently four employees serving provisionally in the subject title with Trenton Psychiatric Hospital subject to open competitive examination procedures.
.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the petitioner presents in a letter received by this agency on January 22, 2020, that she has been serving provisionally in the subject title with the appointing authority since June 2017. Recently, she learned that she indicated on her application that her preference area was Camden County and not Mercer County, where she works. She is requesting to change her preference area from Camden County to Mercer County so that she can remain employed with the appointing authority.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an applicant may amend a previously submitted application only prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, the Division of Agency Services correctly did not certify the petitioner’s name for the certifications in Mercer County as the petitioner did not indicate on her application that she would accept employment in that county. However, although the petitioner does not specifically state so, it is presumed that she did not realize at the time of her application that she would only be certified to counties she selected in the preference areas on her original application. Any other conclusion is illogical as the record indicates that the petitioner works in Mercer County. Further, the Commission notes that one of the main purposes of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State government and the petitioner has demonstrated that she merits consideration for a position in the subject title by passing the examination. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Further, it is noted that there are only five eligibles that remain on the list who have expressed interest in working in Mercer County and there are four individuals provisionally serving in the subject title at Trenton Psychiatric Hospital. Therefore, based on the number of anticipated openings, the subject elgible list is expected to be incomplete for appointments with the appointing authority. Additionally, the appellant made the request to change her preference area to Mercer County prior to certification OS200109 being issued, and she continues to provisionally serve in the subject title. Accordingly, on strictly equitable grounds, the Commission finds good cause is established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and the petitioner’s application for the subject examination shall be amended to indicate that her preference areas shall include Mercer County. See In the Matter of Shilpa Gandhi (CSC, decided April 18, 2018). Further, the Commission orders that the appellant be added to certification OS200109 for current opportunities.
It is noted that this remedy is limited to the particular circumstances of this matter and does not set a precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the petitioner’s request be granted and the petitioner’s application be amended to indicate that her work location preference areas shall include Mercer County. Additionally, her name shall be added to certification OS200109 for current opportunities.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel 154 N.J. 121
- In the Matter of Shilpa Gandhi (April 18, 2018)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.