NJ Civil Service Navigator

Shontai Bryant, CSC Docket No. 2020-2278

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 29, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-2278: examination eligibility, granted. Shontai Bryant appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the requirements for the promotional examination for Secretarial Assistant 2, Non-Sten

Commission decisions · Meeting of April 29, 2020

Shontai Bryant appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the requirements for the promotional examination for Secretarial Assistant 2, Non-Stenographic (PS0779T), Department of Transportation.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
April 29, 2020, item B-14
Outcome
Granted
Title
SECRETARIAL ASSISTANT 2, NON-STENOGRAPHIC
Employer
Transportation
Examination
PS0779T
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-014 04-29-20.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundShontai Bryant appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the requirements for the promotional examination for Secretarial Assistant 2, Non-Stenographic (PS0779T), Department of Transportation.

The requirements for the subject title were four years of experience in secretarial and administrative clerical work. The requirements needed to be met by the October 21, 2019 closing date. The appellant was the only applicant and the examination was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates.

On the appellant’s application, she indicated that she was provisionally serving in the subject title from June 2019 to the October 21, 2019 closing date, a Judiciary Clerk 3 from April 2018 to June 2019, an Operations Processor 2 for Wells Fargo from September 2012 to April 2018, and a Vault Clerk Lead for Brinks from April 2015 to September 2017. Agency Services credited the appellant with five months of experience based on her provisional service in the subject title, but determined that she lacked three years and seven months of experience.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant highlights her 30 college credits. She asserts that her education and experience provide over 10 years of clerical and administrative experience. The appellant notes that the job specifications for the Judiciary Clerk title series indicate that incumbents in these titles provide clerical and administrative support. She presents that in addition to the experience listed on her application, she also has 10 years of clerical customer support experience in the banking industry. The appellant states that all of her experience includes some type of clerical, personnel and administrative duties. She submits a letter from her current supervisor in support of her appeal.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax these rules for good cause in a particular situation, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisInitially, it is noted that Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was ineligible for the subject title as, outside of her provisional experience in the subject title, the appellant was not performing secretarial or administrative clerical duties. However, it cannot be ignored that although the primary focus of the appellant’s duties in most of her previous positions do not precisely mirror the required experience, she has provided significant amounts of administrative and clerical support in those positions. Moreover, she continues to serve provisionally in the subject title and the examination was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates. Accordingly, in this matter, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to accept the appellant’s experience, for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the examination.

This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, the cancellation of the examination be rescinded and Shontai Bryant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.