NJ Civil Service Navigator

Wilneyda Luna, CSC Docket No. 2020-2315

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 20, 2020, CSC Docket No. 2020-2315: removal from an eligible list, granted. Wilneyda Luna, represented by Francisco S. Guzman, Esq., appeals the removal of her name from the Principal Account Clerk (M0380U), Jersey City, eligible list for failure to respon

Commission decisions · Meeting of May 20, 2020

Wilneyda Luna, represented by Francisco S. Guzman, Esq., appeals the removal of her name from the Principal Account Clerk (M0380U), Jersey City, eligible list for failure to respond to the certification notice.

Matter
Removal from an eligible list
Decided
May 20, 2020, item B-6
Outcome
Granted
Stated ground
Did not respond or appear
Title
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNT CLERK
Employer
Jersey City
Examination
M0380U
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-006 05-20-20.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundWilneyda Luna, represented by Francisco S. Guzman, Esq., appeals the removal of her name from the Principal Account Clerk (M0380U), Jersey City, eligible list for failure to respond to the certification notice.

The appellant’s name was certified to the appointing authority on August 30, 2019 on certification OL191045. The appellant was sent notice of the subject certification on or around September 9, 2019. However, the appellant’s name was removed from the list for failing to respond to the certification. The list expired on November 9, 2019.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant submits a notarized sworn statement indicating that she never received the subject certification notice.

BackgroundAlthough given the opportunity, the appointing authority did not respond.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for “non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification.” N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b), in conjunction with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(d), provides that the appellant has the burden of proof to show by a preponderance of the evidence that an appointing authority’s decision to remove the appellant’s name from an eligible list was in error.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, the appellant submitted a notarized statement, attesting to the fact that she did not receive the Notice of Certification in question. While there is a presumption that mail correctly addressed, stamped and mailed was received by the party to whom it was addressed, the appellant has rebutted that presumption in submitting her notarized statement in this matter. See SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State Department of Human Services, 146 N.J.614 (1996); Szczesny v. Vasquez, 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354 (App. Div. 1962); In the Matter of Joseph Bahun, Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (App. Div. May 21, 2001). Therefore, the Civil Service Commission finds that the appellant’s name shall be restored to the subject eligible list. As this list expired on November 9, 2019, the list shall be revived at the time of the next certification to allow the appellant to be considered for prospective appointment.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, Wilneyda Luna’s name be restored to the Principal Account Clerk (M0380U), Jersey City promotional eligible list, and the list be revived at the time of the next certification to allow the appellant to be considered for prospective appointment.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • Szczesny v. Vasquez 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354
  • In the Matter of Joseph Bahun Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (May 21, 2001)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.