George Brown, CSC Docket No. 2020-574
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 10, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-574: examination eligibility, granted. George Brown appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the education requirements for the promotional examination for Accounting Assistant (P
Commission decisions · Meeting of September 10, 2019
George Brown appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the education requirements for the promotional examination for Accounting Assistant (PM0338A), Willingboro.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- September 10, 2019, item B-60
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- ACCOUNTING ASSISTANT
- Employer
- Willingboro Township
- Examination
- PM0338A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-060 09-10-19.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundGeorge Brown appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the education requirements for the promotional examination for Accounting Assistant (PM0338A), Willingboro.
The examination at issue was announced with specific requirements that had to be met as of the March 21, 2019 closing date. The requirements were satisfactory completion of at least 60 semester hour credits at an accredited college or university including a minimum of 12 semester hour credits in accounting courses. The appellant was the only applicant and the examination was canceled due to a lack of qualified candidates.
On his application, the appellant indicated that he possessed a Bachelor’s degree. Additionally, his transcript indicated that he earned accounting credits as follows: Rowan – ACC-112 400 Principals of Accounting with Spreadsheet (four credits); Rowan – ACC-113 171 Principals of Accounting 2 (four credits); William Paterson – ACCT 211 Financial Accounting (three credits); and William Paterson ACCT 212 Managerial Accounting (three credits). Further, the appellant indicated that he was provisionally serving in the subject title from July 2017 to the March 21, 2019 closing date. Personnel records indicate that the appellant’s permanent title is Clerk 2 and he has been employed by the appointing authority since March 2014 in clerical titles. Agency Services found that the appellant met the 60 credit requirement but only possessed 11 accounting credits.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant highlights his Bachelor’s degree and argues that he has earned 14 accounting credits as described above.
CONLCUSION
AnalysisIn this matter, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant only had 11 applicable accounting credits: Rowan – ACC-112 400 Principals of Accounting with Spreadsheet (four credits); Rowan – ACC-113 171 Principals of Accounting 2 (four credits); and William Paterson ACCT 212 Managerial Accounting (three credits). Agency Services correctly did not credit the appellant for William Paterson – ACCT 211 Financial Accounting (three credits) as this course covered similar material at a similar level as the Rowan – ACC-112 400 Principals of Accounting with Spreadsheet (four credits) course. However, it cannot be ignored that the appellant has been provisionally serving in the subject title since July 2017 and the record demonstrates that he has been successfully performing the duties of this title as evidenced by his continued service in that title, including after the March 21, 2019 closing date. Finally, the list was cancelled due to a lack of qualified candidates. Therefore, the Civil Service Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) which provides that all requirements for promotional examinations must be met by the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit the appellant to the subject examination.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, the cancellation of the examination be rescinded, and George Brown’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.