NJ Civil Service Navigator

Teresa Baker, CSC Docket No. 2020-686

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 19, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-686: removal from an eligible list, granted. Teresa Baker appeals Mercer County’s request to remove her name from the eligible list for Senior Library Assistant (PC0090U), on the basis that she failed to respond to the ce

Commission decisions · Meeting of November 19, 2019

Teresa Baker appeals Mercer County’s request to remove her name from the eligible list for Senior Library Assistant (PC0090U), on the basis that she failed to respond to the certification notice.

Matter
Removal from an eligible list
Decided
November 19, 2019, item B-30
Outcome
Granted
Stated ground
Did not respond or appear
Title
SENIOR LIBRARY ASSISTANT
Examination
PC0090U
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-030 11-19-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundTeresa Baker appeals Mercer County request to remove her name from the eligible list for Senior Library Assistant (PC0090U), on the basis that she failed to respond to the certification notice.

By way of background, the appellant’s name appeared on the subject eligible list that promulgated on June 2, 2016 and expired on June 1, 2019. The appellant’s name appeared on certification PL190610 that was issued to the appointing authority on May 6, 2019. In disposing of the certification, the appointing authority requested the removal of the appellant’s name, contending that she failed to respond to the May 13, 2019 certification notice.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant maintains that she submitted a change of address request on April 24, 2019 to this agency. However, she did not receive the May 13, 2019 notice. Moreover, she maintains that she took extra steps in ensuring she would receive her mail including obtaining a post office box. However, she still did not receive all of her mail at her new address. Agency records indicate that the appellant submitted her change of address to this agency on April 24, 2019. Agency records indicate the appellant’s address was updated July 12, 2019.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that an appellant has the burden of proof to show that an appointing authority’s decision to remove the appellant’s name from an eligible list was in error.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, the record establishes that the appellant submitted a change of address to this agency on April 24, 2019. However, her address was not updated until July 2019 after the certification notice had already been mailed and after the list expired on June 1, 2019. As a result of the delay, the appellant did not receive her certification notice for the subject certification. Therefore, under these circumstances, the appellant’s name should be restored to the subject eligible list for Senior Library Assistant (PC0090U), Mercer County. Since the (PC0090U), eligible list expired on June 1, 2019, it is appropriate to revive this list at the time of the next certification to allow the appellant to be considered for prospective appointment at that time.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted and the list for Senior Library Assistant (PC0090U) be revived in order for the appellant to be considered for appointment at the time of the next certification for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.