NJ Civil Service Navigator

Jeffrey McCarrick, CSC Docket No. 2020-697, 2020-870

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 23, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-697: certification or appointment, granted. The Division of Agency Services, on behalf of Sparta, requests that Jeffrey McCarrick be assigned a retroactive appointment date to the Police Sergeant title. In addition, Jeffre

Commission decisions · Meeting of October 23, 2019

The Division of Agency Services, on behalf of Sparta, requests that Jeffrey McCarrick be assigned a retroactive appointment date to the Police Sergeant title. In addition, Jeffrey McCarrick seeks his eligibility for the promotional examination for Police Lieutenant (PM0936A), Sparta.

Matter
Certification or appointment
Decided
October 23, 2019, item B-35
Outcome
Granted
Title
POLICE LIEUTENANT
Employer
Sparta Township
Examination
PM0936A, PM0874V
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-035 10-23-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that these requests be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundThe Division of Agency Services (Agency Services), on behalf of Sparta, requests that Jeffrey McCarrick be assigned a retroactive appointment date to the Police Sergeant title. In addition, Jeffrey McCarrick seeks his eligibility for the promotional examination for Police Lieutenant (PM0936A), Sparta.

By way of background, the eligible list for Police Sergeant (PM0874V), Sparta, promulgated on May 24, 2018 with the names of 12 eligibles and is set to expire on May 23, 2021. McCarrick ranked second on the subject eligible list. Effective October 19, 2018, the first and to date, the only certification, was issued from the PM0874V eligible list (Certification No. PL181332). In disposing of PL181332, which contained the names of the first three eligibles, Sparta appointed McCarrick effective October 23, 2018.1

Appellant's argumentIn its request, Agency Services indicates that the appointing authority experienced an unexpected vacancy in its police department when a Police Sergeant retired abruptly effective August 1, 2018. The appointing authority explained that upon the recommendation of the Police Chief, McCarrick was asked “to fill this position for the purpose of maintaining departmental operations.” However, Agency Services notes that while the appointing authority indicated that it intended to promote McCarrick permanently to the title of Sergeant effective August 1, 2018, it failed to request a certification at that time. Agency Services further notes that that McCarrick has been performing the duties of a Police Sergeant since August 1, 2018. In support of its request, Agency Services attaches additional documentation including a Township of Sparta “Payroll Change Notice” which changed McCarrick’s salary to “Sergeant’s pay” effective August 1, 2018.

Background1 It is noted that the first ranked eligible on the PM0874V list is a non-veteran and was bypassed.

CONCLUSION

A retroactive appointment date “for seniority purposes only” may be approved when it is evidenced that an appellant could have been appointed on the subject date, but through error on the part of either the appointing authority or the Civil Service Commission, received a later appointment date, or for other good cause. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-1.10(c). The “for seniority purposes only” appointment designation establishes that an appellant has no claim for or entitlement to back pay. However, such an award establishes that for seniority-based programs, such as salary step placement, layoffs, and vacation leave time entitlement, seniority is predicated upon the retroactive appointment date. See In the Matter of Wayne A. Robbins (Merit System Board, decided September 5, 1991).

In the instant matter, the record establishes that the appointing authority intended to promote McCarrick to Police Sergeant effective August 1, 2018. However, due to administrative error, the appointing authority did not request a certification. Nevertheless, had the appointing authority requested a certification at that time, McCarrick could have been permanently appointed effective August 1, 2018. Furthermore, the appointing authority verifies that McCarrick has been serving as a Police Sergeant since August 1, 2018 and has successfully passed his working test period. Therefore, based on the foregoing, it is appropriate to grant a retroactive date of permanent appointment to the appellant as Police Sergeant effective August 1, 2018, for seniority and record keeping purposes.

With respect to the eligibility of McCarrick for the promotional examination for Police Lieutenant (PM0963A), Sparta,2 this examination was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service in the title of Police Sergeant as of the closing date of September 30, 2019. As noted previously, McCarrick has been serving as a Police Sergeant in Sparta and he could have been permanently appointed on August 1, 2018. Thus, as of the September 30, 2019 closing date, he had completed the requisite one year period.

2 It is noted that the subject announcement indicates that the test is scheduled to be administered in

October 10, 2019 and McCarrick has been conditionally admitted pending the resolution of this matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted and McCarrick receive a date of permanent appointment to the Police Sergeant title effective August 1, 2018, and all of his seniority based benefits be adjusted accordingly. It is also ordered that McCarrick be admitted to the Police Lieutenant (PM0963A), Sparta promotional examination.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • In the Matter of Wayne A. Robbins (September 5, 1991)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.