NJ Civil Service Navigator

Alex Roane, CSC Docket No. 2020-714

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of October 23, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-714: examination eligibility, granted. Alex Roane appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the

Commission decisions · Meeting of October 23, 2019

Alex Roane appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the dual title Sewer Repairer Supervisor/Water Repair Supervisor (PM0110A), Deptford Township.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
October 23, 2019, item B-30
Outcome
Granted
Examination
PM0110A
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-030 10-23-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundAlex Roane appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the “dual” title Sewer Repairer Supervisor/Water Repair Supervisor (PM0110A), Deptford Township. A dual title is a title that combines two separate titles into one classification; applicants need to meet the minimum requirements of both titles in order to be declared eligible.

The subject examination had a closing date of January 22, 2019 and was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in the title Sewer Repairer/Water Repairer and who met the announced requirements. The announced experience requirement for this examination was three years of experience in sewer installation or repair work and/or in varied plumbing work and/or in the operation and maintenance of sewer maintenance equipment, one year of which shall have been in a lead worker capacity, AND four years of experience in the installation, repair, and maintenance of water mains, pipes, valves, hydrants, and other water service equipment and/or in the operation of water treatment plant apparatus and/or in varied plumbing work. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on August 8, 2019.

On his application, the appellant listed four positions: Equipment Operator, Water and Sewer Repairer, Pump Station Operator, and Meter Repairer. Official records indicate that the appellant was provisionally appointed to Sewer Repair

Supervisor/Water Repair Supervisor in September 2018, and prior to that, was in the titles Equipment Operator, Sewer Repairer/Water Repairer 1, and Water Meter Repairer. He was credited with two years, five months for both experience requirements for his experience as a Sewer Repairer/Water Repairer 1. Thus, he was found to be lacking seven months of sewer installation or repair work and/or in varied plumbing work and/or in the operation and maintenance of sewer maintenance equipment, including one year in a lead worker capacity, and one year, seven months of experience in the installation, repair, and maintenance of water mains, pipes, valves, hydrants, and other water service equipment and/or in the operation of water treatment plant apparatus and/or in varied plumbing work.

On appeal, the Superintendent of Utilities states that the appellant has done everything imaginable in the field of water and wastewater, and has forty years of experience in heavy equipment operation, installation and repair of distribution and collection system infrastructure, and maintenance and repairs of pumps and electrical systems and metering systems, and he has been a lead worker of crews on a daily basis since February 2013.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date.

N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. As N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) specifically provides that examination applications may only be amended prior to the filing date, information regarding additional experience provided on appeal usually cannot be considered. However, in this case, the appellant clearly did not complete his application correctly and include his provisional experience in the subject title on his application. If he had, he would have been credited with an additional five months of applicable experience for both titles, including five months of experience as a lead worker. To date, the appellant has accrued at least an additional eight months of experience as a provisional in the subject title, which would allow him to meet the Sewer Repairer Supervisor portion of the requirement. Additionally, while he was not credited with his experience as a Water Meter Repairer, it is clear that he was a Pump Station Operator as well. His experience in this title maintaining pumping station equipment and repairing pumps and bubbler systems can be considered the operation of water treatment plant apparatus and varied plumbing work. In sum, with the acceptance of eight months of experience after the closing date and his experience as a Water Meter Repairer, the appellant meets both requirements, and the examination was cancelled for a lack of eligible candidates. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional experience in his provisional position beyond the closing date, and admit him to the examination. The appellant is cautioned to include all employment positions on future applications.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.