NJ Civil Service Navigator

Jason Miranda, CSC Docket No. 2020-93

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 10, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2020-93: examination eligibility, granted. Jason Miranda appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examinatio

Commission decisions · Meeting of September 10, 2019

Jason Miranda appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Senior Planner, Environmental (PC2877W), Passaic County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
September 10, 2019, item B-61
Outcome
Granted
Title
SENIOR PLANNER ENVIRONMENTAL
Employer
Passaic County
Examination
PC2877W
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-061 09-10-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundJason Miranda appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the open-competitive examination for Senior Planner Environmental (PC2877W), Passaic County.

The subject examination had a closing date of December 21, 2018 and was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in any competitive title and who met the announced requirements. These requirements included possession of a Bachelor's degree from an accredited college or university including or supplemented by twenty-one semester hour credits in professional planning subjects such as the principles of land use planning, history of city planning, planning project design, planning law and administration AND two years of experience in environmental planning. Possession of a current and valid license as a Professional Planner in New Jersey issued by the State Board of Professional Planners could be substituted for the educational requirement. Possession of a Master’s degree in Planning from an accredited college or university may be substituted for one year of the required experience. The appellant was found to be ineligible based on a lack of experience. As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on July 10, 2019.

On his application, the appellant indicated possession of a Bachelor’s degree in Urban and Public Affairs, and a Master’s degree in Spatial Planning. As such, he was required to possess one year of applicable experience. He listed two positions on his application, provisional Senior Planner Environmental and Assistant Planner, and two internships. He was credited with four months of experience in his provisional position. His remaining experience was not accepted, and he was found to be lacking eight months of applicable experience.

On appeal, the appellant restates the duties of his positions, and argues that his Assistant Planner experience is applicable.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date.

N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(f) provides that an application may only be amended prior to the announced closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. He was credited with four months of experience in his provisional position, and a review of his application not did not indicate that environmental planning was the primary focus of his Assistant Planner position. However, the examination was cancelled, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test, and he has accrued at least an additional eight months of experience since the November 2018 closing date. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4- 2.1(f) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) to accept the appellant’s additional experience beyond the closing date and admit him to the examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.