NJ Civil Service Navigator

Shavonne Davis, CSC Docket No. 2021-1388

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 28, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1388: examination eligibility, granted. Shavonne Davis appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open competitive examination for Advocate, Victim

Commission decisions · Meeting of April 28, 2021

Shavonne Davis appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open competitive examination for Advocate, Victim Witness Program (C0357B), Atlantic County.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
April 28, 2021, item B-15
Outcome
Granted
Title
ADVOCATE VICTIM WITNESS PROGRAM
Employer
Atlantic County
Examination
C0357B
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 04-28-21 EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundShavonne Davis appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the experience requirements for the open competitive examination for Advocate, Victim Witness Program (C0357B), Atlantic County.

The subject examination had a March 6, 2020 closing date. The education requirement was a Bachelor’s degree. The experience requirement was one year of experience providing advice and referral services to individuals or groups coping with social, emotional, psychological or other problems. A total of 21 candidates applied for the subject examination and two were found eligible. Certification OL210192 was issued containing the names of the two eligibles and its disposition is due June 15, 2021. The list expires on March 10, 2024.

On the appellant’s application, she indicated that she possessed a Master’s degree. Additionally, the appellant indicated that she was provisionally serving in the subject title from October 2019 to the March 6, 2020 closing date, an Onsite Benefit Enrollment Counselor for Aon Universe Workplace Solutions from October 2018 to August 2019, a Long-Term Substitute Teacher for John Winslow Elementary School from April 2019 to June 2019, a Spa Front Desk Agent for Hard Rock Hotel & Casino from May 2018 to February 2019, a Spa Concierge for Borgata Hotel, Casino & Spa from May 2017 to August 2017, a Guest Experience Representative from the Red Door Salon & Spa from October 2016 to May 2017, an Educational Opportunity

Fund Administrative Assistant for Cumberland County College from May 2016 to August 2016, and a Spa Concierge for Borgata Hotel, Casino & Spa from May 2015 to April 2016 and May 2014 to August 2014. Agency Services credited her with meeting the education requirement and with four months of the required experience based on her provisional service in the subject title, but determined that she lacked eight months of experience.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1- 1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purpose of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that the appellant has the burden of proof in examination appeals.

AnalysisPersonnel records indicate that the appellant continues to provisionally serve in the subject title and has gained the required experience after the closing date. Additionally, the eligible list is incomplete as it only contains two names. Therefore, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) and accept the appellant’s experience gained after the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the subject examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.