NJ Civil Service Navigator

Matthew Long, CSC Docket No. 2021-1461

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 30, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1461: examination scoring or administration, denied. Matthew Long, represented by Craig Gumpel, Esq., requests retroactive seniority for service in another jurisdiction prior to his intergovernmental transfer to Ocean City. L

Commission decisions · Meeting of June 30, 2021

Matthew Long, represented by Craig Gumpel, Esq., requests retroactive seniority for service in another jurisdiction prior to his intergovernmental transfer to Ocean City. Long also appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he lacked the required amount of permanent status in a title to which the examination was open for the promotional examination for Fire Captain (PM2340C), Ocean City.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
June 30, 2021, item B-15
Outcome
Denied
Title
FIRE CAPTAIN
Employer
Ocean City
Examination
PM2340C
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 06-30-21 ED.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that the request and appeal be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentMatthew Long, represented by Craig Gumpel, Esq., requests retroactive seniority for service in another jurisdiction prior to his Intergovernmental Transfer (IGT) to Ocean City. Mr. Long also appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that he lacked the required amount of permanent status in a title to which the examination was open for the promotional examination for Fire Captain (PM2340C), Ocean City.

BackgroundBy way of background, the petitioner intergovernmentally transferred from Wildwood to Ocean City effective April 6, 2019. As a Fire Fighter, in accordance with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-7.4(c). he did not retain seniority for purposes of determining promotional, layoff or demotional rights and sick and vacation leave entitlements. The subject promotional examination was announced with a closing date of February 22, 2021. Candidates for the subject examination were required to have three years of continuous permanent service in the title Fire Fighter as of the February 22, 2021 closing date. As of the closing date, the petitioner had one year, ten months, 29 days of permanent service as a Fire Fighter with Ocean City based on his transfer date of April 6, 2019. As such, he did not have three years of time in grade with Ocean City. It is noted that there are 21 eligible candidates, and the examination has not yet been held.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the petitioner states that prior to his intergovernmental transfer to Ocean City, he was a full-time career service Fire Fighter with Wildwood since October 24, 2014. While employed by Wildwood, the petitioner presents that he had numerous opportunities to serve as a first level supervisor on an acting basis, but was not able to take the Civil Service first level supervisor exam because he fell 15 days short of the required three years of service as a Fire Fighter. He also states that he was a part time/seasonal Firefighter/EMT in Wildwood and a volunteer firefighter with the Marmora Volunteer Fire Company, in Marmora.

BackgroundOn April 6, 2019, the petitioner states that he intergovernmentally transferred from Wildwood to Ocean City. He claims that as part of the transfer process, he was not advised that his seniority with Wildwood would not transfer to Ocean City for Civil Service purposes, including promotional examination eligibility. In this regard, the petitioner contends that he believed that his years of experience with Wildwood would be credited for promotional examination purposes. As such, the petitioner believed that he had 6.5 years of aggregate, continuous service as a Fire Fighter as of the announced closing date for the subject examination. In support of his request, John P. Smith, Director/Fire Chief, Ocean City, indicates that during the pendency of the next Fire Captain promotional list, it is projected that there could be up to seven Fire Captain vacancies. Based on the large number of anticipated vacancies, Ocean City “strongly believes that the Captain’s promotional examination should be as competitive as possible, giving all those who would best serve our community the opportunity to compete for a promotional position during the life of the next captain’s promotional list.”

Appellant's argumentThe petitioner argues that in the Intergovernmental Transfer Agreement, a transferee neither agrees to nor waives seniority rights. The appellant cites In the Matter of Fire Captain (PM0432A) Ewing, (CSC, decided September 20, 2019), stating that the Commission held that the “legislative intent of N.J.S.A. 40A: 14-29 is to insure that only experienced employees can compete for superior ranked positions in the crucial area of public safety.” He argues that in Ewing, supra, the Commission relaxed N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(b) in order to permit firefighters who had a minimum of three years of firefighter experience, but not with Ewing, be permitted to sit for the Fire Captain examination. In Ewing, supra, the Commission identified the purpose regarding three years’ experience as to ensure that any superior position of command be filled by experienced personnel and not by someone incapable, inefficient or inexperienced. While Ewing involved a newly created fire department whose personnel could not possibly have had the requisite three years of continuous permanent service, the petitioner argues that the principles regarding capable, efficient, and experienced career firefighters are applicable in his situation. Further, he maintains that the Commission has permitted aggregate, non- continuous service to count towards promotion examination eligibility in unique circumstances. For example, in In the Matter of Chuvonda Covington-Leach, et al., County Correction Sergeant (PC2530E) Union County, (MSB, decided August 11,2004), Union County corrections officers were granted seniority for promotion examination eligibility based on prior Union County’ service after they transferred to the State and Monmouth County corrections and then transferred back to Union

County. The petitioner also argues that the Commission permits Fire Fighters who successfully appeal a list removal based on a psychiatric evaluation are granted a retroactive appointment date for seniority-based purposes. Therefore, those individuals are permitted to sit for a first level supervisor examination as long the Fire Fighter has completed the working test period. Given the appointing authority’s support of his appeal, the petitioner requests that the Commission relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A-4-2.6(b) and admit him to the subject examination.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-7.4(c) states that in the case of an intergovernmental transfer in accordance with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-7.1A, those law enforcement officers, including sheriff’s officers and county corrections officers, who waive all accumulated seniority rights, and for all firefighters, shall not retain such seniority for purposes of determining promotional, layoff or demotinal rights and sick and vacation leave entitlements.

N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29 states that:

In any municipality except in cities of the first class a promotion of any member or officer of the paid or part-paid fire department or force to a superior position shall be made from the membership of such department or force. No person shall be eligible for promotion to be a superior officer unless he shall have previously served as a permanent paid fireman for at least 3 years in such department or force.

N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(b) provides:

In local service, applicants for promotion from entry level law enforcement or firefighter titles shall have three years of continuous permanent service in a title to which the examination is open, except as otherwise provided by law.

AnalysisFor purposes of Intergovernmental Transfers, aggregate service shall be calculated in the same manner as seniority as set forth in N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.15(d)3 which provides:

Continuous permanent service accumulated prior to an intergovernmental transfer pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-7.1A shall be deducted from seniority for all firefighters, and for those law enforcement officers, including sheriff's officers and county correction officers, who have waived all accumulated seniority rights in agreeing to an intergovernmental transfer.

In the instant matter, the petitioner was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination since he was not permanent in the announced title of Fire Fighter for three years as of the closing date in the title Fire Fighter with Ocean City. Rather, as of the announced closing date, the petitioner had one year, ten months, 29 days of permanent service from his transfer date, April 6, 2019, and thereby lacked 1 year, 1 month, and 1 day.

The petitioner is essentially arguing that he did not understand the terms of his IGT agreement. The Commission is not persuaded. The petitioner signed the section “Employee Agreement.” Directly underneath, on the same page, is the section “Sending Jurisdiction Agreement.” That section states, “Transferees shall retain accumulated seniority rights and sick leave, except for those transferring in the title of Firefighter or those in Law Enforcement titles who have signed the attached waiver.” On the next page, in the section “Receiving Jurisdiction Agreement,” point 2 states, “Employees shall retain all accumulated seniority rights and sick leave, except for those transferring in the title of Firefighter. …” This information was repeated on the form as it comes directly from N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29, and it is not ambiguous. Specifically, N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29 provides that no person shall be eligible for promotion to be a superior officer unless he shall have previously served as a permanent paid fireman for at least 3 years in such department or force (emphasis added). As indicated in Ewing, supra, N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) permits the Commission to relax the rules for good cause to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, but the Commission is not empowered to relax statute. The petitioner was not employed by Ocean City for three years as of the closing date. The petitioner also did not transfer back to the sending jurisdiction, as in Covington-Leach, supra, and reference to that case is misplaced.

Signing the agreement was a condition of employment, and the appellant could have chosen not to be intergovernmentally transferred to Ocean City from Wildwood. An intergovernmental transfer is a voluntary agreement between an appointing authority, prospective employee, and this agency and no party is compelled to participate in the program. It is the employee’s responsibility to understand the terms of any agreement he signs, or to ask questions regarding the meaning of terms he does not understand. There are multiple uses for seniority, which is not restricted to examinations. The rules do not permit an individual in the title of Fire Fighter to retain Civil Service related seniority rights. Regardless, as indicated above N.J.S.A. 40A:14-29 requires an individual to have 3 years in such department or force. The petitioner did not have three years of continuous permanent service as a Fire Fighter in Ocean City as of the February 22, 2021 closing date. Accordingly, he was correctly found to be ineligible for the examination, and he is not entitled to retroactive seniority. .

Accordingly, a thorough review of the record indicates that the petitioner has failed to demonstrate entitlement to relief, and the decision of Agency Services, that he did not meet the announced requirements for eligibility by the examination closing date, is amply supported by the record and he provides no basis to disturb this decision.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request for retroactive seniority, and the appeal for admittance to the examination, be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.