Pavel Butrim, CSC Docket No. 2021-1514
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of August 24, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2021-1514: discipline, penalty modified. Pavel Butrim, County Correctional Police Officer, Hudson County, Department of Corrections, 60 working day suspension on charges of incompetency, inefficiency or failure to perform duties
Commission decisions · Meeting of August 24, 2022
Pavel Butrim, County Correctional Police Officer, Hudson County, Department of Corrections, 60 working day suspension on charges of incompetency, inefficiency or failure to perform duties, insubordination, conduct unbecoming a public employee, neglect of duty and other sufficient cause.
- Matter
- Discipline
- Decided
- August 24, 2022, item A-2
- Outcome
- Penalty modified
- ALJ's recommendation
- Modify the 60 working day suspension to a 30 working day suspension.
- What the Commission did with it
- Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
- Penalty appealed
- 60 working day suspension
- Penalty after the decision
- 30 working day suspension
- Title
- COUNTY CORRECTIONAL POLICE OFFICER
- Employer
- Hudson County
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (A002 BUTRIM PAVEL.PDF)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.
BackgroundThe appeal of Pavel Butrim, County Correctional Police Officer, Hudson County, Department of Corrections, 60 working day suspension on charges, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Ernest M. Bongiovanni (ALJ), who rendered his initial decision on July 6, 2022. Exceptions were filed on behalf of the appointing authority and a reply to exceptions was filed on behalf of the appellant.
AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ’s initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, including a thorough review of the exceptions and reply, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), at its meeting of August 24, 2022, accepted and adopted the Findings of Fact and Conclusion as contained in the attached AL.J’s initial decision.
Since the 60 working day suspension has been modified to a 30 working day suspension, the appellant is entitled to 30 days of mitigated back pay, benefits and seniority pursuant to N.d.A.C. 4A:2-2.10. However, he is not entitled to counsel fees. N.J.A.C. 44:2-2.12(a) provides for the award of counsel fees only where an employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues in an appeal of a major disciplinary action. The primary issue in the disciplinary appeal is the merits of the charges. See Johnny Walcott v. City of Plainfield, 282 N.J. Super. 121,128 (App. Div. 1995): In the Matter of Robert Dean (MSB, decided January 12, 1993); In the Matter of Ralph Cozzino (MSB, decided September 21, 1989). In the case at hand, although the penalty was modified by the Commission, charges were sustained, and major discipline was imposed. Consequently, as appellant has failed to meet the standard set forth at N.dJA.C. 4A:2-2.12, counsel fees must be denied.
This decision resolves the merits of the dispute between the parties concerning the disciplinary charges and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority.
However, in light of the Appellate Division’s decision, Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections, Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (App. Div. Feb. 26, 2003), the Commission’s decision will not become final until any outstanding issues concerning back pay are finally resolved.
ORDER
The Civil Service Commission finds that the action of the appointing authority in suspending the appellant was justified and modifies the 60 working day suspension to a 30 working day suspension. The Commission further orders that the appellant be granted 30 days of back pay, benefits, and seniority. The amount of back pay awarded is to be reduced and mitigated as provided for in N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10. Proof of income earned, and an affidavit of mitigation shall be submitted by or on behalf of the appellant to the appointing authority within 30 days of issuance of this decision. Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any dispute as to the amount of back pay.
Counsel fees are denied pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12.
The parties must inform the Commission, in writing, if there is any dispute as to back pay within 60 days of issuance of this decision. In the absence of such notice, the Commission will assume that all outstanding issues have been amicably resolved by the parties and this decision shall become a final administrative determination pursuant to R. 2:2-3(a)(2). After such time, any further review of this matter shall be pursued in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Decisions this one cites
- Johnny Walcott v. City of Plainfield 282 N.J. Super. 121,128
- In the Matter of Robert Dean (January 12, 1993)
- In the Matter of Ralph Cozzino (September 21, 1989)
- Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (February 26, 2003)
Later decisions that cite this one
- PAVEL BUTRIM (April 10, 2024)
- PAVEL BUTRIM (April 10, 2024)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.