NJ Civil Service Navigator

N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12 Counsel fees

N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12, Counsel fees. The Civil Service Commission shall award partial or full reasonable counsel fees incurred in proceedings before it and incurred in major disciplinary procee Full text with 2 recorded amendments, 117 citing decisions, cited by 1 other rule.

Appeals, Discipline, and Separations · Major Discipline

Current through New Jersey Register, Vol. 58 No. 14, July 20, 2026. Reviewed as of July 26, 2026.

This is an annotated mirror, not the official publication. Verify against the Civil Service Commission before relying on it.

In plain language

Counsel fees are recoverable, but the bar is high and the rates are capped. The Commission must award partial or full reasonable fees, covering both the proceedings before it and the departmental level major disciplinary proceedings, where the employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues. Partial success on a secondary point does not qualify. Where fees are awarded the parties settle the amount between themselves wherever possible. The rate ranges are set in the rule rather than by the market: 100 to 150 dollars an hour for an associate, 150 to 175 for a partner with fewer than 15 years in practice, and 175 to 200 for a partner with 15 years or more, or for anyone whose practice concentrates in employment or labor law regardless of years.

Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team from the text of N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. It is a description of the rule, not the rule itself, and not legal advice.

(a) The Civil Service Commission shall award partial or full reasonable counsel fees incurred in proceedings before it and incurred in major disciplinary proceedings at the departmental level where an employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues before the Commission. #

(b) When the Commission awards counsel fees, the actual amount shall be settled by the parties whenever possible. #

(c) Subject to the provisions of (d) and (e) below, the following fee ranges shall apply in determining counsel fees: #

1. Associate in a law firm: $ 100.00 to $ 150.00 per hour; #

2. Partner or equivalent in a law firm with fewer than 15 years of experience in the practice of law: $ 150.00 to $ 175.00 per hour; or #

3. Partner or equivalent in a law firm with 15 or more years of experience in the practice of law, or, notwithstanding the number of years of experience, with a practice concentrated in employment or labor law: $ 175.00 to $ 200.00 per hour. #

(d) If an attorney has signed a specific fee agreement with the employee or employee's negotiations representative, the attorney shall disclose the agreement to the appointing authority. The fee ranges set forth in (c) above may be adjusted if the attorney has signed such an agreement, provided that the attorney shall not be entitled to a greater rate than that set forth in the agreement. #

(e) A fee amount may also be determined or the fee ranges in (c) above adjusted based on the circumstances of a particular matter, in which case the following factors (see the Rules of Professional Conduct of the New Jersey Court Rules, at RPC 1.5(a)) shall be considered: #

1. The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; #

2. The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services, applicable at the time the fee is calculated; #

3. The nature and length of the professional relationship with the employee; and #

4. The experience, reputation and ability of the attorney performing the services. #

(f) Counsel fees incurred in matters at the departmental level that do not reach the Civil Service Commission on appeal or are incurred in furtherance of appellate court review shall not be awarded by the Commission. #

(g) Reasonable out-of-pocket costs shall be awarded, including, but not limited to, costs associated with expert and subpoena fees and out-of-State travel expenses. Costs associated with normal office overhead shall not be awarded. #

(h) The attorney shall submit an affidavit and any other documentation to the appointing authority. #

(i) If settlement on an amount cannot be reached, either party may request, in writing, Commission review. #

(j) See N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.13 for situations in which certain law enforcement officers or firefighters have appealed a removal. #

Can you recover your legal costs

The bar is not winning. The Commission awards partial or full reasonable counsel fees where an employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues before it. Beating one charge out of four, or having a removal cut to a long suspension, is a result but not obviously that result, and the rule offers no formula for deciding when a partial win crosses the line.

Where the fees were incurred matters as much as the outcome. The award covers fees incurred in proceedings before the Commission and fees incurred in major disciplinary proceedings at the departmental level, which is the useful part: the hearing in front of your own employer is inside the scope. Two things are outside it. Fees incurred at the departmental level in a matter that never reaches the Commission on appeal are not awarded, so winning outright at the departmental hearing leaves the bill with you. Nor are fees incurred in furtherance of appellate court review.

The rates are set as ranges. An associate in a law firm is $100.00 to $150.00 an hour. A partner or equivalent with fewer than 15 years in practice is $150.00 to $175.00. A partner or equivalent with 15 or more years, or with a practice concentrated in employment or labor law regardless of years, is $175.00 to $200.00. If your attorney signed a specific fee agreement with you or your negotiations representative, the attorney has to disclose it to the appointing authority, and the ranges may be adjusted, though the attorney cannot recover a greater rate than the agreement provides. The ranges may also be adjusted on the circumstances of the matter, using the professional conduct factors: the time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions and the skill needed, the fee customarily charged locally for similar services, the nature and length of the professional relationship, and the experience, reputation and ability of the attorney.

Costs are handled separately from fees and more generously than you might expect. Reasonable out-of-pocket costs are awarded, including expert and subpoena fees and out-of-State travel expenses. Costs associated with normal office overhead are not. The attorney submits an affidavit and supporting documentation to the appointing authority, the parties settle the amount where they can, and if they cannot either side may request Commission review in writing.

Which kinds of appeal reach this rule at all is decided elsewhere, and it is narrow. Back pay, benefits and counsel fees may be awarded in disciplinary appeals and where a layoff action has been in bad faith. In every other appeal they may be granted only where the appointing authority unreasonably failed or delayed carrying out a Commission order, or where the Commission finds sufficient cause on the particular case, which may include a showing that the appointing authority acted in bad faith or with invidious motivation. Winning a classification, examination or determination of rights appeal does not ordinarily carry a fee award with it. Seniority credit, by contrast, may be awarded in any successful appeal.

One timetable is stated. Where the Commission grants a law enforcement officer's or firefighter's removal appeal, the appointing authority must reinstate immediately, and back pay, benefits, seniority and counsel fees are due within 60 days of the decision issuing. For everybody else the rules set no deadline for payment, only the settlement and review process.

Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team. Every statement here traces to the rules cited on this page. It is not legal advice, and a collective agreement may change how these rules apply to you.

Amendment history

Rule numbers, effective dates and New Jersey Register citations as published. 2 recorded changes.

  1. ReadoptedR.2010 d.176
    42 N.J.R. 693(a); 42 N.J.R. 1855(a)
  2. AmendedR.2001 d.424
    33 N.J.R. 2725(a); 33 N.J.R. 3280(a); 33 N.J.R. 3895(a); 41 N.J.R. 2720(a)

How this rule has been applied

117 decisions have cited N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. The list below is citations to those decisions, not the decisions. The summary above is ours, written from the opinion after reading it. Nothing here is legal advice.

Decisions we have read

In re Hearn417 N.J. Super. 289, October 27, 2010

A State employee disciplined under the workplace anti-discrimination policy won his appeal to the Civil Service Commission and then asked it to pay his lawyer. The Appellate Division agreed he was entitled to reasonable fees, reading the fee provisions as reaching his situation even though the discipline arose under the anti-discrimination policy rather than an ordinary disciplinary charge. The court noted the absence of a rule spelling out the limits of the agency's discretion on fees, and decided the findings before it were enough to establish sufficient cause for an award.

Read the opinion (free, via CourtListener). Summary written from the decision, checked July 26, 2026.

New Jersey Supreme Court (2)
  • Burris v. Police Department, Township of West Orange769 A.2d 11122001
  • Oches v. Township of Middletown Police Dept.155 N.J. 1; 713 A.2d 993
Appellate Division (1)
  • In re Malone381 N.J. Super. 344; 886 A.2d 181cites (e)
Superior Court (3)
  • In re Hearn417 N.J. Super. 289; 9 A.3d 10322010cites (a)
  • Marjarum v. Township of Hamilton336 N.J.Super. 85
  • Walcott v. City of Plainfield282 N.J.Super. 121; 659 A.2d 532
Civil Service Commission final determinations (84)
  • In re Ugorji, Newark Sch. Distr., OAL Docket No. CSV 06917-24
  • In re Peterson, Greystone Park Psychiatric Ctr., Dep't of HealthDocket CSV 04312-21
  • In re F.B., et al., Twp. of West Orange, CSC Docket Nos. 2022-1079, et al. (Consolidated)Docket 2022-1079
  • In re Smirnov, Dep't of the Treas., Div. of Inv.Docket CSV 07719-19
  • In re Martin, East Orange Police Dep't, CSC Docket No. 2021-628Docket 2021-628
  • In re Dye, City of Passaic, Dep't of Eng'gDocket CSV 13516-18
  • In re Bermudez, Cumberland Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.Docket CSR 07412-20
  • In re O.C., Police Officer (S9999U), City of Elizabeth, CSC Docket No. 2021-332Docket 2021-332
  • In re Montanez, Hudson Cnty., Dep't of Roads & Pub. Prop., CSC DKT. NO. 2020-1917
  • In re Bonaparte-Hunt, Hudson Cnty., Dep't of Family Servs.Docket CSV 11809-19
  • In re Martin, City of East Orange Police Dep'tDocket CSV 16115-19
  • In re Hayes, N.J. Veterans Mem'l Home -- Vineland, Dep't of Military & Veterans Affairs, CSC Docket Nos. 2020-1602 and 2020-711 (Consolidated)Docket 2020-1602 and 2020-711
  • In re Sanchez, Town of West New York, Dep't of Parks & Pub. Prop., CSC Docket No. 2020-225Docket 2020-225
  • In re Flynn, Monmouth Cnty., Dep't of Transp.Docket CSV 13685-15
  • In re Ramos, Irvington Twp., CSC Docket No. 2019-865Docket 2019-865
  • PNDA. In re Graves, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2019-1974Docket 2019-1974
  • In re Fiscella, Jr., Twp. of Belleville, Dep't of Pub. Works, CSC Docket No. 2019-2748Docket 2019-2748
  • In re Robinson, Albert C. Wagner Youth Corr. Facility, Dep't of Corrs.Docket CSV 11292-17
  • In re Collins, Newark Pub. Sch. Dist., CSC Docket No. 2018-348Docket 2018-348
  • In re Mulligan, East Jersey State Prison, Dep't of Corrs., CSC DKT. NO. 2017-2469Docket CSV 02610-17
  • In re Reyes, City of Paterson, OAL Docket No. CSR 03407-17
  • In re Jenkins, CSC Docket No. 2018-1038, OAL Docket No. CSV 15785-2017Docket 2018-1038
  • In re Curtis, Dep't of Children & FamiliesDocket CSV 8037-16
  • In re Smith, Dep't of Corr., CSC Docket No. 2017-1864Docket 2017-1864
  • In re Cardona-Malatino, Camden Cnty. Police, CSC Docket No. 2018-1834Docket 2018-1834
  • In re Wilson, CSC Docket No. 2017-3166Docket 2017-3166
  • In re Jarpa, Dep't of Mil. Affairs, Veterans Haven Transitional Home, CSC DKT. NO. 2016-1783
  • In re Miller Northern State Prison, Dep't of Corrs., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-237
  • In re Jones, Atlantic City Dep't of Admin., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-1203
  • In re Mendoza, Hudson Cnty. CSC Docket No. 2015-3356Docket 2015-3356
  • Office of Administrative Law and the Civil Service Commission. In re Salahuddin, Atlantic City, CSC Docket No. 2016-1365Docket 2016-1365
  • In re Malta-Roman, Hudson Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2016-1302Docket 2016-1302
  • In re Jeanpierre, North Jersey Developmental Ctr., Dep't of Human Servs., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-2755
  • In re Gandolfo, Twp. of West Orange, Dep't of Planning & Dev., CSC DKT. NO. 2015-2330
  • In re Vilardo, Jersey City Public Schs., CSC Dkt. No. 2015-2563
  • In re Mendoza, Hudson Cnty., CSC Dkt. No. 2015-141
  • In re Bush, N.J. Dep't. of Corrs., East Jersey State PrisonDocket CSR 14630-13
  • In re Ortiz, Hudson Cty., CSC Docket No. 2012-2997Docket 2012-2997
  • In re Reedinger, Middlesex Cty., CSC Docket No. 2014-1491Docket 2014-1491
  • In re Bessie McDalton, CSC Docket No. 2014-991Docket 2014-991
  • In re Burdsall, Judiciary, Vicinage 15 -- Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem (Consolidated), OAL Docket Nos. CSV 15226-11 and CSV 558-13
  • Data Processing Systems Programmer. In re Juan Bellu, Twp. of Brick, CSC Dkt.no. 2014-1896cites (a)
  • In re Robert Rivera, Passaic CountyDocket CSV 06927-11cites (a)
  • In re Hopkins, Mercer Cnty.
  • In re William Roberts, OAL Docket No. CSR 4388-13
  • In re Joseph Graffagnino, Middlesex Cnty.Docket CSR 9216-13
  • In re Wang, Judiciary, Union Vicinage, CSC DKT. NO. 2013-211Docket CSV 11707-12
  • In re Hulse, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2013-3505Docket 2013-3505
  • In re Donna Jackson, Hudson Cnty., CSC DKT. No. 2014-1226cites (f)
  • In re Serdiuk, Dep't of Military & Veterans Affairs, CSC DKT. NO. 2013-739Docket CSV 7323-12cites (a)
  • In re Reedinger, Middlesex Cnty., Dep't. of Adult Corr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-3155
  • In re Benita Cisrow, Dep't. of Corr., CSC DKT. No. 2013-2347cites (a)
  • In re Keith Wickham, Jr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-1195cites (a)
  • In re Pedulla, Monmouth Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2011-5039, OAL Docket No. CSV 9154-11Docket 2011-5039cites (a)
  • In re Morris, CSC Docket No. 2013-2927Docket 2013-2927
  • In re Bowman, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2013-1085Docket 2013-1085cites (f)
  • In re Brandis Puryear, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-285Docket CSV 11114-12
  • In re Shawn PressleyDocket CSV 05761-2012cites (a)
  • In re Ah'Kaleem Ford, Hudson Cnty., CSC Dkt. Nos. 2012-3290 and 2013-1158
  • In re Joseph Napoleone, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-3243cites (a)
  • In re Linda Tisby, Camden Cnty., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-1166cites (a)
  • In re Sandra Matthews, Essex Cnty., Dep't of Citizen Servs., CSC Dkt. No. 2012-1627Docket CSV 15052-11
  • In re John Venables, Jr., City of Camden, CSC Dkt. No. 2010-1283Docket CSV 10418-09cites (a)
  • In re Richard Bell, CSC Dkt. No. 2012-540cites (a)
  • In re Alexander Loizos, Dep't. of Corr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-1009cites (a)
  • In re Robert Zorn, Mercer County, CSC Dkt. No. 2011-404cites (a)
  • In re Brett Schmidt, Bayside State Prison Dep't of Corr.Docket CSV 14759-11cites (a)
  • In re James Gillespie, Cnty. of Cape May, OAL Docket No. CSV 4752-12cites (a)
  • In re Wanda Hunt, Dep't of Human Servs., OAL Docket No. CSV 8511-2012
  • In re Scott Haynes, OAL Docket No. CSV 4367-12cites (a)
  • In re Zygmunt Krawczyk, Juvenile Justice Comm'nDocket CSR 10047-12cites (a)
  • In re Robert Trent, Department of Corrections, CSC Docket No. 2012-2923Docket 2012-2923
  • In re Daniel Caetano, City of NewarkDocket CSV 13338-11
  • In re Vincent De Ponte, Monmouth Cnty.Docket CSV 5497-12cites (a)
  • Plan. In re Mark Lyszczak, CSC Docket No. 2012-1651Docket 2012-1651cites (d)
  • In re Wade Rosenberger, CSC Dkt.. No. 2012-3046
  • Harrington v. Dep't. of Human Services11 N.J.A.R. 5371989
  • Ramos v. Department of Corrections95 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 413
  • Onori v. City of Burlington Department of Public Works95 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 53
  • Black v. Lakehurst Borough Police Department94 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 35
  • Gill v. State Dept. of Health92 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 142
  • Neal v. Police Dept., City of New Brunswick92 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 52
  • Franklin v. City of Atlantic City91 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 71
Office of Administrative Law initial decisions (27)
  • In re Camel, Passaic Cnty. Sheriff's Dep'tDocket CSV 04328-21
  • In re Peterson, Greystone Park Psychiatric Ctr., Dep't of Health [Stockton Univ.]Docket CSV 04312-21
  • In re Wilcher et al., Newark School District
  • In re Brown, Salem City Police Dep't, OAL Docket No. CSV 04702-19
  • In re Spellman, Atlantic Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs.
  • In re Bermudez, Cumberland Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.Docket CSR 07412-20
  • In re Ruggiero, Camden Cnty., Dep't of Fin.Docket CSV 01778-19
  • In re Pharo, Atlantic Cnty. Dep't of Pub. SafetyDocket CSR 15785-19
  • In re Smith, Irvington Twp. Dep't of Pub. SafetyDocket CSV 01123-18
  • In re Smith, Irvington Twp. Dep't of Pub. SafetyDocket CSV 01123-18
  • In re Rivera, Twp. of Belleville, Dep't of Pub. WorksDocket CSV 00228-16
  • In re Rivera, Essex Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.
  • In re Lindsey Newark Police Dep't.Docket CSV 10680-12
  • In re Morales, Hudson Cnty. Div. of Roads & Pub. Property, OAL Docket No. CSV 19280-15
  • In re Marino, Dep't of Children & FamiliesDocket CSV 16936-15
  • In re Hill, Twp. of Lakewood, Dep't of Public WorksDocket CSV 09021-14
  • In re Williams, Twp. of Lakewood, OAL Docket No. CSV 01037-14
  • In re Turbeville, Dep't of Human Servs., OAL Docket No. CSV 16531-13
  • In re Nasca, N.J. State Prison Dep't of Corr.Docket CSV 8406-10
  • In re Bell, Atlantic City, OAL CSV DKT. NO. 4695-09, CSC DKT. NO. 2009-3187
  • In re BowlesDocket CSV 3256-09
  • In re HawkinsDocket CSV 4469-05
  • In re Kearns, Delancey, Buckley, Police Dep't., City of Elizabeth, OAL CSV Dkt. NO. 05349-06
  • In re PettifordDocket CSV 8801-07
  • In re Grupico, Burlington Cty., and in re McLeod, Burlington Cty.Docket CSV2489-06
  • In re Valerie Brown, OAL Docket Nos. CSV 7960-06 & CSV 7962-06
  • In re PaytonDocket CSV 7740-05

Commission decisions citing 4A:2-2.12

182 decisions of the Civil Service Commission since January 16, 2019 cite this section (penalty modified 86, penalty reversed 60, granted 7, as the minutes record the outcome). The newest:

All 182 decisions

This rule points to

Rules that point here