N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12 Counsel fees
N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12, Counsel fees. The Civil Service Commission shall award partial or full reasonable counsel fees incurred in proceedings before it and incurred in major disciplinary procee Full text with 2 recorded amendments, 120 citing decisions, cited by 1 other rule.
Current through New Jersey Register, Vol. 58 No. 14, July 20, 2026. Reviewed as of July 26, 2026.
This is an annotated mirror, not the official publication. Verify against the Civil Service Commission before relying on it.
In plain language
Counsel fees are recoverable, but the bar is high and the rates are capped. The Commission must award partial or full reasonable fees, covering both the proceedings before it and the departmental level major disciplinary proceedings, where the employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues. Partial success on a secondary point does not qualify. Where fees are awarded the parties settle the amount between themselves wherever possible. The rate ranges are set in the rule rather than by the market: 100 to 150 dollars an hour for an associate, 150 to 175 for a partner with fewer than 15 years in practice, and 175 to 200 for a partner with 15 years or more, or for anyone whose practice concentrates in employment or labour law regardless of years.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team from the text of N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. It is a description of the rule, not the rule itself, and not legal advice.
Can you recover your legal costs
The bar is not winning. The Commission awards partial or full reasonable counsel fees where an employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues before it. Beating one charge out of four, or having a removal cut to a long suspension, is a result but not obviously that result, and the rule offers no formula for deciding when a partial win crosses the line.
Where the fees were incurred matters as much as the outcome. The award covers fees incurred in proceedings before the Commission and fees incurred in major disciplinary proceedings at the departmental level, which is the useful part: the hearing in front of your own employer is inside the scope. Two things are outside it. Fees incurred at the departmental level in a matter that never reaches the Commission on appeal are not awarded, so winning outright at the departmental hearing leaves the bill with you. Nor are fees incurred in furtherance of appellate court review.
The rates are set as ranges. An associate in a law firm is $100.00 to $150.00 an hour. A partner or equivalent with fewer than 15 years in practice is $150.00 to $175.00. A partner or equivalent with 15 or more years, or with a practice concentrated in employment or labour law regardless of years, is $175.00 to $200.00. If your attorney signed a specific fee agreement with you or your negotiations representative, the attorney has to disclose it to the appointing authority, and the ranges may be adjusted, though the attorney cannot recover a greater rate than the agreement provides. The ranges may also be adjusted on the circumstances of the matter, using the professional conduct factors: the time and labour required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions and the skill needed, the fee customarily charged locally for similar services, the nature and length of the professional relationship, and the experience, reputation and ability of the attorney.
Costs are handled separately from fees and more generously than you might expect. Reasonable out-of-pocket costs are awarded, including expert and subpoena fees and out-of-State travel expenses. Costs associated with normal office overhead are not. The attorney submits an affidavit and supporting documentation to the appointing authority, the parties settle the amount where they can, and if they cannot either side may request Commission review in writing.
Which kinds of appeal reach this rule at all is decided elsewhere, and it is narrow. Back pay, benefits and counsel fees may be awarded in disciplinary appeals and where a layoff action has been in bad faith. In every other appeal they may be granted only where the appointing authority unreasonably failed or delayed carrying out a Commission order, or where the Commission finds sufficient cause on the particular case, which may include a showing that the appointing authority acted in bad faith or with invidious motivation. Winning a classification, examination or determination of rights appeal does not ordinarily carry a fee award with it. Seniority credit, by contrast, may be awarded in any successful appeal.
One timetable is stated. Where the Commission grants a law enforcement officer's or firefighter's removal appeal, the appointing authority must reinstate immediately, and back pay, benefits, seniority and counsel fees are due within 60 days of the decision issuing. For everybody else the rules set no deadline for payment, only the settlement and review process.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team. Every statement here traces to the rules cited on this page. It is not legal advice, and a collective agreement may change how these rules apply to you.
(a) The Civil Service Commission shall award partial or full reasonable counsel fees incurred in proceedings before it and incurred in major disciplinary proceedings at the departmental level where an employee has prevailed on all or substantially all of the primary issues before the Commission. #
(b) When the Commission awards counsel fees, the actual amount shall be settled by the parties whenever possible. #
(c) Subject to the provisions of (d) and (e) below, the following fee ranges shall apply in determining counsel fees: #
1. Associate in a law firm: $ 100.00 to $ 150.00 per hour; #
2. Partner or equivalent in a law firm with fewer than 15 years of experience in the practice of law: $ 150.00 to $ 175.00 per hour; or #
3. Partner or equivalent in a law firm with 15 or more years of experience in the practice of law, or, notwithstanding the number of years of experience, with a practice concentrated in employment or labor law: $ 175.00 to $ 200.00 per hour. #
(d) If an attorney has signed a specific fee agreement with the employee or employee's negotiations representative, the attorney shall disclose the agreement to the appointing authority. The fee ranges set forth in (c) above may be adjusted if the attorney has signed such an agreement, provided that the attorney shall not be entitled to a greater rate than that set forth in the agreement. #
(e) A fee amount may also be determined or the fee ranges in (c) above adjusted based on the circumstances of a particular matter, in which case the following factors (see the Rules of Professional Conduct of the New Jersey Court Rules, at RPC 1.5(a)) shall be considered: #
1. The time and labor required, the novelty and difficulty of the questions involved, and the skill requisite to perform the legal service properly; #
2. The fee customarily charged in the locality for similar legal services, applicable at the time the fee is calculated; #
3. The nature and length of the professional relationship with the employee; and #
4. The experience, reputation and ability of the attorney performing the services. #
(f) Counsel fees incurred in matters at the departmental level that do not reach the Civil Service Commission on appeal or are incurred in furtherance of appellate court review shall not be awarded by the Commission. #
(g) Reasonable out-of-pocket costs shall be awarded, including, but not limited to, costs associated with expert and subpoena fees and out-of-State travel expenses. Costs associated with normal office overhead shall not be awarded. #
(h) The attorney shall submit an affidavit and any other documentation to the appointing authority. #
(i) If settlement on an amount cannot be reached, either party may request, in writing, Commission review. #
(j) See N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.13 for situations in which certain law enforcement officers or firefighters have appealed a removal. #
Amendment history
Rule numbers, effective dates and New Jersey Register citations as published. 2 recorded changes.
- ReadoptedR.2010 d.17642 N.J.R. 693(a); 42 N.J.R. 1855(a)
- AmendedR.2001 d.42433 N.J.R. 2725(a); 33 N.J.R. 3280(a); 33 N.J.R. 3895(a); 41 N.J.R. 2720(a)
How this rule has been applied
120 decisions have cited N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. The list below is citations to those decisions, not the decisions. The summary above is ours, written from the opinion after reading it. Nothing here is legal advice.
Decisions we have read
In re Hearn417 N.J. Super. 289, October 27, 2010
A State employee disciplined under the workplace anti-discrimination policy won his appeal to the Civil Service Commission and then asked it to pay his lawyer. The Appellate Division agreed he was entitled to reasonable fees, reading the fee provisions as reaching his situation even though the discipline arose under the anti-discrimination policy rather than an ordinary disciplinary charge. The court noted the absence of a rule spelling out the limits of the agency's discretion on fees, and decided the findings before it were enough to establish sufficient cause for an award.
Read the opinion (free, via CourtListener). Summary written from the decision, checked July 26, 2026.
New Jersey Supreme Court (2)
- Burris v. Police Department, Township of West Orange769 A.2d 11122001
- Oches v. Township of Middletown Police Dept.155 N.J. 1; 713 A.2d 993
Appellate Division (1)
- In re Malone381 N.J. Super. 344; 886 A.2d 181; 2005 N.J. Super. LEXIS 340
Superior Court (3)
- In re Hearn417 N.J. Super. 289; 9 A.3d 1032; 2010 N.J. Super. LEXIS 2082010
- Marjarum v. Township of Hamilton336 N.J.Super. 85
- Walcott v. City of Plainfield282 N.J.Super. 121; 659 A.2d 532
Civil Service Commission final determinations (87)
- In re Ugorji, Newark Sch. Distr., OAL Docket No. CSV 06917-242025 N.J. CSC LEXIS 196
- In re Ugorji, Newark Sch. Distr., OAL Docket No. CSV 06917-242025 N.J. CSC LEXIS 196
- In re Peterson, Greystone Park Psychiatric Ctr., Dep't of Health2022 N.J. CSC LEXIS 447Docket CSV 04312-21
- In re F.B., et al., Twp. of West Orange, CSC Docket Nos. 2022-1079, et al. (Consolidated)2022 N.J. CSC LEXIS 119Docket 2022-1079
- In re Smirnov, Dep't of the Treas., Div. of Inv.2021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 529; 2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 432Docket CSV 07719-19
- In re Martin, East Orange Police Dep't, CSC Docket No. 2021-6282021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 153Docket 2021-628
- In re Dye, City of Passaic, Dep't of Eng'g2021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 103; 2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 98Docket CSV 13516-18
- In re Bermudez, Cumberland Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.2021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 73Docket CSR 07412-20
- In re O.C., Police Officer (S9999U), City of Elizabeth, CSC Docket No. 2021-3322021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 41Docket 2021-332
- 2021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 46; 2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 19
- In re Montanez, Hudson Cnty., Dep't of Roads & Pub. Prop., CSC DKT. NO. 2020-19172021 N.J. CSC LEXIS 13; 2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 11
- In re Bonaparte-Hunt, Hudson Cnty., Dep't of Family Servs.2020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1033Docket CSV 11809-19
- In re Martin, City of East Orange Police Dep't2020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 945; 2020 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 332Docket CSV 16115-19
- In re Hayes, N.J. Veterans Mem'l Home -- Vineland, Dep't of Military & Veterans Affairs, CSC Docket Nos. 2020-1602 and 2020-711 (Consolidated)2020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 267Docket 2020-1602 and 2020-711
- In re Hayes, N.J. Veterans Mem'l Home -- Vineland, Dep't of Military & Veterans Affairs, CSC Docket Nos. 2020-1602 and 2020-711 (Consolidated)2020 N.J. CSC LEXIS 267Docket 2020-1602 and 2020-711
- In re Sanchez, Town of West New York, Dep't of Parks & Pub. Prop., CSC Docket No. 2020-2252019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1140Docket 2020-225
- In re Flynn, Monmouth Cnty., Dep't of Transp.2019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 438Docket CSV 13685-15
- In re Ramos, Irvington Twp., CSC Docket No. 2019-8652019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 236Docket 2019-865
- PNDA. In re Graves, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2019-19742019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 173Docket 2019-1974
- In re Fiscella, Jr., Twp. of Belleville, Dep't of Pub. Works, CSC Docket No. 2019-27482019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 180Docket 2019-2748
- In re Robinson, Albert C. Wagner Youth Corr. Facility, Dep't of Corrs.2019 N.J. CSC LEXIS 168Docket CSV 11292-17
- In re Collins, Newark Pub. Sch. Dist., CSC Docket No. 2018-3482018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 429Docket 2018-348
- In re Collins, Newark Pub. Sch. Dist., CSC Docket No. 2018-3482018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 429Docket 2018-348
- In re Mulligan, East Jersey State Prison, Dep't of Corrs., CSC DKT. NO. 2017-24692018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 434Docket CSV 02610-17
- In re Reyes, City of Paterson, OAL Docket No. CSR 03407-172018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 352
- In re Jenkins, CSC Docket No. 2018-1038, OAL Docket No. CSV 15785-20172018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 351Docket 2018-1038
- In re Curtis, Dep't of Children & Families2018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 330Docket CSV 8037-16
- In re Smith, Dep't of Corr., CSC Docket No. 2017-18642018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 126Docket 2017-1864
- In re Cardona-Malatino, Camden Cnty. Police, CSC Docket No. 2018-18342018 N.J. CSC LEXIS 122Docket 2018-1834
- In re Wilson, CSC Docket No. 2017-31662017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 631Docket 2017-3166
- In re Jarpa, Dep't of Mil. Affairs, Veterans Haven Transitional Home, CSC DKT. NO. 2016-17832017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 535
- In re Miller Northern State Prison, Dep't of Corrs., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-2372016 N.J. CSC LEXIS 8
- In re Jones, Atlantic City Dep't of Admin., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-12032016 N.J. CSC LEXIS 21
- In re Mendoza, Hudson Cnty. CSC Docket No. 2015-33562015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 186Docket 2015-3356
- Office of Administrative Law and the Civil Service Commission. In re Salahuddin, Atlantic City, CSC Docket No. 2016-13652015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 196Docket 2016-1365
- In re Malta-Roman, Hudson Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2016-13022015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 190Docket 2016-1302
- In re Jeanpierre, North Jersey Developmental Ctr., Dep't of Human Servs., CSC DKT. NO. 2014-27552015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 3
- In re Gandolfo, Twp. of West Orange, Dep't of Planning & Dev., CSC DKT. NO. 2015-23302015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 42
- In re Vilardo, Jersey City Public Schs., CSC Dkt. No. 2015-25632015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 229
- In re Mendoza, Hudson Cnty., CSC Dkt. No. 2015-1412015 N.J. CSC LEXIS 481
- In re Bush, N.J. Dep't. of Corrs., East Jersey State Prison2014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 413Docket CSR 14630-13
- In re Ortiz, Hudson Cty., CSC Docket No. 2012-29972014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 411Docket 2012-2997
- In re Reedinger, Middlesex Cty., CSC Docket No. 2014-14912014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 479Docket 2014-1491
- In re Bessie McDalton, CSC Docket No. 2014-9912014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 500Docket 2014-991
- In re Burdsall, Judiciary, Vicinage 15 -- Cumberland, Gloucester and Salem (Consolidated), OAL Docket Nos. CSV 15226-11 and CSV 558-132014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 339
- Data Processing Systems Programmer. In re Juan Bellu, Twp. of Brick, CSC Dkt.no. 2014-18962014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 348
- In re Robert Rivera, Passaic County2014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 338Docket CSV 06927-11
- In re Hopkins, Mercer Cnty.2014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 378
- In re William Roberts, OAL Docket No. CSR 4388-132014 N.J. CSC LEXIS 384
- In re Joseph Graffagnino, Middlesex Cnty.2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1147Docket CSR 9216-13
- In re Wang, Judiciary, Union Vicinage, CSC DKT. NO. 2013-2112013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1072Docket CSV 11707-12
- In re Hulse, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2013-35052013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1151Docket 2013-3505
- In re Donna Jackson, Hudson Cnty., CSC DKT. No. 2014-12262013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1101
- In re Serdiuk, Dep't of Military & Veterans Affairs, CSC DKT. NO. 2013-7392013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1164Docket CSV 7323-12
- In re Reedinger, Middlesex Cnty., Dep't. of Adult Corr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-31552013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 1146
- In re Benita Cisrow, Dep't. of Corr., CSC DKT. No. 2013-23472013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 999
- In re Keith Wickham, Jr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-11952013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 692
- In re Pedulla, Monmouth Cnty., CSC Docket No. 2011-5039, OAL Docket No. CSV 9154-112013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 820Docket 2011-5039
- In re Morris, CSC Docket No. 2013-29272013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 758Docket 2013-2927
- In re Bowman, Newark, CSC Docket No. 2013-10852013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 815Docket 2013-1085
- In re Brandis Puryear, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-2852013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 476Docket CSV 11114-12
- In re Shawn Pressley2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 475Docket CSV 05761-2012
- In re Ah'Kaleem Ford, Hudson Cnty., CSC Dkt. Nos. 2012-3290 and 2013-11582013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 474
- In re Joseph Napoleone, CSC Dkt. No. 2013-32432013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 481
- In re Linda Tisby, Camden Cnty., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-11662013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 580
- In re Sandra Matthews, Essex Cnty., Dep't of Citizen Servs., CSC Dkt. No. 2012-16272013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 656Docket CSV 15052-11
- In re John Venables, Jr., City of Camden, CSC Dkt. No. 2010-12832013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 610Docket CSV 10418-09
- In re Richard Bell, CSC Dkt. No. 2012-5402013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 564
- In re Alexander Loizos, Dep't. of Corr., CSC Dkt. No. 2013-10092013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 618
- In re Robert Zorn, Mercer County, CSC Dkt. No. 2011-4042013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 242
- In re Brett Schmidt, Bayside State Prison Dep't of Corr.2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 365Docket CSV 14759-11
- In re James Gillespie, Cnty. of Cape May, OAL Docket No. CSV 4752-122013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 353
- In re Wanda Hunt, Dep't of Human Servs., OAL Docket No. CSV 8511-20122013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 342
- In re Scott Haynes, OAL Docket No. CSV 4367-122013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 338
- In re Zygmunt Krawczyk, Juvenile Justice Comm'n2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 164Docket CSR 10047-12
- In re Robert Trent, Department of Corrections, CSC Docket No. 2012-29232013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 203Docket 2012-2923
- In re Daniel Caetano, City of Newark2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 109Docket CSV 13338-11
- In re Vincent De Ponte, Monmouth Cnty.2013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 31Docket CSV 5497-12
- Plan. In re Mark Lyszczak, CSC Docket No. 2012-16512013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 119Docket 2012-1651
- In re Wade Rosenberger, CSC Dkt.. No. 2012-30462013 N.J. CSC LEXIS 129
- Harrington v. Dep't. of Human Services11 N.J.A.R. 5371989
- Ramos v. Department of Corrections95 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 413
- Onori v. City of Burlington Department of Public Works95 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 53
- Black v. Lakehurst Borough Police Department94 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 35
- Gill v. State Dept. of Health92 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 142
- Neal v. Police Dept., City of New Brunswick92 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 52
- Franklin v. City of Atlantic City91 N.J.A.R.2d (CSV) 71
Office of Administrative Law initial decisions (27)
- In re Camel, Passaic Cnty. Sheriff's Dep't2024 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 684Docket CSV 04328-21
- In re Peterson, Greystone Park Psychiatric Ctr., Dep't of Health [Stockton Univ.]2022 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 448Docket CSV 04312-21
- In re Wilcher et al., Newark School District2022 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 438
- In re Brown, Salem City Police Dep't, OAL Docket No. CSV 04702-192022 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 66
- In re Spellman, Atlantic Cnty. Dep't of Human Servs.2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 80
- In re Bermudez, Cumberland Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.2021 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 18Docket CSR 07412-20
- In re Ruggiero, Camden Cnty., Dep't of Fin.2020 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 325Docket CSV 01778-19
- In re Pharo, Atlantic Cnty. Dep't of Pub. Safety2020 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 191Docket CSR 15785-19
- In re Smith, Irvington Twp. Dep't of Pub. Safety2019 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 145Docket CSV 01123-18
- In re Smith, Irvington Twp. Dep't of Pub. Safety2019 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 49Docket CSV 01123-18
- In re Rivera, Twp. of Belleville, Dep't of Pub. Works2018 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 592Docket CSV 00228-16
- In re Rivera, Essex Cnty. Dep't of Corrs.2018 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 397
- In re Lindsey Newark Police Dep't.2017 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1134Docket CSV 10680-12
- In re Morales, Hudson Cnty. Div. of Roads & Pub. Property, OAL Docket No. CSV 19280-152017 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1021
- In re Marino, Dep't of Children & Families2017 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 458Docket CSV 16936-15
- In re Hill, Twp. of Lakewood, Dep't of Public Works2015 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 282Docket CSV 09021-14
- In re Williams, Twp. of Lakewood, OAL Docket No. CSV 01037-142015 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 779
- In re Turbeville, Dep't of Human Servs., OAL Docket No. CSV 16531-132015 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 785
- In re Nasca, N.J. State Prison Dep't of Corr.2011 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 945Docket CSV 8406-10
- In re Bell, Atlantic City, OAL CSV DKT. NO. 4695-09, CSC DKT. NO. 2009-31872010 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1044
- In re Bowles2009 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 816Docket CSV 3256-09
- In re Hawkins2008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1222Docket CSV 4469-05
- In re Kearns, Delancey, Buckley, Police Dep't., City of Elizabeth, OAL CSV Dkt. NO. 05349-062008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1550
- In re Pettiford2008 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 719Docket CSV 8801-07
- In re Grupico, Burlington Cty., and in re McLeod, Burlington Cty.2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1302Docket CSV2489-06
- In re Valerie Brown, OAL Docket Nos. CSV 7960-06 & CSV 7962-062007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1263
- In re Payton2007 N.J. AGEN LEXIS 1168Docket CSV 7740-05
This rule points to
Rules that point here
Elsewhere in Major Discipline
- 4A:2-2.1 Employees covered
- 4A:2-2.2 Types of discipline
- 4A:2-2.3 General causes
- 4A:2-2.4 Limitations on suspensions and fines
- 4A:2-2.5 Opportunity for hearing before the appointing authority
- 4A:2-2.6 Hearings before the appointing authority
- 4A:2-2.7 Actions involving criminal matters
- 4A:2-2.8 Appeals to Civil Service Commission
- 4A:2-2.9 Commission hearings
- 4A:2-2.10 Back pay, benefits and seniority
- 4A:2-2.11 Interest
- 4A:2-2.13 Removal appeals of certain law enforcement officers and firefighters