Louis Crammer, CSC Docket No. 2021-1598
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 21, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1598: examination eligibility, granted. Louis Crammer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supply Support Technician
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 21, 2021
Louis Crammer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supply Support Technician 2 (PS3354T), Department of Transportation.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- July 21, 2021, item B-12
- Outcome
- Granted
- Recorded vote
- L. Webster Cobb (Yes), Dolores Gorczyca (Recused), Daniel W. O’Mullan (Yes), Diomedes Tsitouras (Yes)
- Employer
- Transportation
- Examination
- PS3354T, PC3354T
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-012 07-21-21 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundLouis Crammer appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that he did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Supply Support Technician 2 (PC3354T), Department of Transportation.
The subject examination closing date was June 22, 2020. The experience requirements were two years of experience in shipping and receiving work in a warehouse, distribution center, maintenance service area or other similar installation, one year of which shall have involved requisitioning, maintaining and/or issuing parts, mechanical/electrical equipment, supplies, materials, food and/or household goods. A total of three employees applied for the subject examination and one was determined eligible. Certification PS210585 was issued and its disposition is due August 30, 2021. The list expires on April 21, 2024.
On the appellant’s application, he indicated that he was provisionally serving in the subject title from December 2019 to the June 22, 2020 closing date, a Truck Driver, Single Axle from January 1994 to December 2019, and a Maintenance Worker 1 from July 1989 to January 1994. Agency Services credited the appellant with seven months of experience based on his provisional service in the subject title, but determined that he lacked one year and five months of experience.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that at management’s direction, in addition to performing his regular duties as a Truck Driver, Single Axle and Maintenance Worker 1, he performed various shipping, receiving, and inventory control duties, which he describes in detail. Further, the appointing authority confirms that the appellant performed the required out-of-title duties throughout his career due to budgetary constraints, hiring/promotional freezes, and other business necessity reasons.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c) provides that, except when permitted for good cause, applicants for promotional examinations with open-competitive requirements may not use experience gained as a result of out-of-title work to satisfy the requirements for admittance to the examination or for credit in the examination process.
N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(g) provides that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) can accept clarifying information in eligibility appeals. For example, information submitted on appeal pertaining to duties in a given position that expands or enlarges information previously submitted is considered clarifying and is accepted.
AnalysisInitially, it is noted that Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was not eligible for the subject title as he did not clearly explain that he performed the required out-of-title duties as a Truck Driver, Single Axle and Maintenance Worker 1. Additionally, the appellant did not provide any confirmation from the appointing authority with his application that he was performing out-of-title duties. However, on appeal, the appellant clarifies how he performed the required duties throughout his career and the appointing authority confirms that the appellant was assigned the required out-of-title duties due to business necessity. Moreover, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the subject title and the list is incomplete as there is only one eligible. Accordingly, in this matter, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(g) and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(c) to accept the appellant’s clarified and verified out-of-title experience, for eligibility purposes only, and admit him to the examination.
This determination is limited to the instant matter and does not provide precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.