Jean Peterson, CSC Docket No. 2021-1760
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 21, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1760: examination eligibility, granted. Jean Peterson appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services that found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Network Administra
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 21, 2021
Jean Peterson appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services that found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Network Administrator 1 (PS3471H), Department of Health.
- Matter
- Examination eligibility
- Decided
- July 21, 2021, item B-15
- Outcome
- Granted
- Employer
- Health and Senior Services
- Examination
- PS3471H
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-015 07-21-21 EG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundJean Peterson appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that found that she did not meet the experience requirements for the promotional examination for Network Administrator 1 (PS3471H), Department of Health.
The subject examination announcement was issued with specific requirements that had to be met as of the July 21, 2020 closing date. The examination was open to employees in the non-competitive division who are currently serving in a title to which the announcement is open and had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date, are currently serving as an Information Technology Specialist and met the requirements listed OR to all employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date, and met the requirements. Those requirements included graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor’s degree which must have included a minimum of eighteen (18) semester hours of credit in mathematics and/or computer science, AND three years of experience in the development, implementation, and maintenance of multi-network, multi-user Local Area Networks (LAN), Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN), and/or Wide Area Networks (WAN) environments. Applicants who did not possess the Bachelor's degree but possessed the 18 semester hour credits could substitute additional experience as indicated on a year-for-year basis with thirty semester hour credits being equal to one year of experience. Lastly, evidence of formal training in Computer Science/Information Technology received at an accredited institution could be submitted with the application for evaluation by the Civil Service Commission for possible credit. There were no admitted candidates, and the examination was cancelled on May 20, 2021.
The appellant met the experience requirement per the substitution clause for education, and was found to be lacking six of the 18 required credits in math or computer science.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant explains that she was provisionally appointed to the subject title after a classification review of her position. She maintains that she has 16 credits in math from two colleges as well as certifications in CompTIA, A+ and Novell Network Administration. She also completed training at Chubb Institute for Information Technician/Help Desk and computer science. The appellant provides descriptions of college classes related to these areas and which are similar to the training she acquired at Chubb Institute. In support of the appeal, the Executive Director, WIC Services, states that the appellant has in depth knowledge of the computer networking requirements that is the core of the WIC program. She states that the appellant manages the overall information technology needs, solves computer and networking problems fast and efficiently, and has made many technical recommendations for new initiatives. Further, the MIS Coordinator supports the appeal. She states that the appellant is the main reason why there is no loss of service to WIC clients, and as a critical member of the WIC IT team. For example, during the pandemic, employees switched to at-home remote access without State-issued laptops or ability to access the network remotely. She states that the appellant resolved network connectivity issues for multiple users to allow continued access to work files from home while maintaining network security.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the examination announcement by the closing date. Further, N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisInitially, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant lacked six credits in math. It is noted that the Network Administrator 1 performs professional work, which includes development, implementation, and maintenance of multinetwork, multi-user Local Area Networks (LAN), Metropolitan Area Networks (MAN), and/or Wide Area Networks (WAN); maintains centralized, decentralized, and remote network services; maintains network security and data integrity; provides consultations and recommendations to infrastructure managers as required to troubleshoot and resolve network problems, monitor overall performance, and conduct upgrades as required; and may be assigned to the administration of Storage Area Networks (SANs).
According to her application, in her current provisional position, the appellant provides deskside support and consultation and technical expertise, monitors trouble calls, determines corrective action, diagnoses and repairs network communication problems (bad ports, cables, or network switches) and hardware components (desktop computers, monitors, laptops, printers, signature pads, and scanners), diagnoses and repairs operating system failures and improper loading of cloud-based applications, and removes malware or viruses. She performs network administration of LAN and WAN, creates new users and assigns permissions for network resources, sets up and configures wireless networks and assigns rights, recovers documents, files and folders that are deleted or corrupt, maintains network security and data integrity including regularly testing and installing, employing remote access, managing the TeamViewer and remote access software database, creates computer images of operating systems and productivity/ virus software, verifies there are no software conflicts, installs image and distributes new hardware, and completes special assignments. The appellant was provisionally appointed to the subject title on July 20, 2019, and remains in her provisional position performing the above duties. A review of the appellants transcripts indicate that she possesses 16 credits in math, thereby lacking only two credits in math. She has obtained 24 credits from the Chubb Institute in PC support, windows desktop support, Netware support, and NT desktop support, receiving a certificate in Computer Technical Support. Although the appellant lacks two of the required in credits in math, the Commission is satisfied that the totality of her education and experience are acceptable to meet the educational requirements for the subject examination. Additionally, the examination was cancelled as the appellant was the sole applicant. Based on these circumstances, the Commission will accept the appellant’s experience, for eligibility purposes, and admit her to the examination.
It is noted that this remedy is limited to the particular circumstances of this matter and does not set a precedent and any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.