NJ Civil Service Navigator

Brian Caruso, CSC Docket No. 2021-1847

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 21, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-1847: examination eligibility, granted. Brian Caruso appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the

Commission decisions · Meeting of July 21, 2021

Brian Caruso appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the dual title Sewer Repairer 1/Water Repairer 1 (PM2850B), Freehold Township.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
July 21, 2021, item B-11
Outcome
Granted
Examination
PM2850B
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-011 07-21-21 EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundBrian Caruso appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for the “dual” title Sewer Repairer 1/Water Repairer 1 (PM2850B), Freehold Township. A dual title is a title that combines two separate titles into one classification; applicants need to meet the minimum requirements of both titles in order to be declared eligible.

The subject examination had a closing date of October 21, 2020 and was open to employees in the non-competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in the title Laborer 1 who met the announced requirements OR and to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in any competitive title who met the announced requirements. These requirements were one year of experience in sewer installation or repair work and/or in varied plumbing work and/or in the operation and maintenance of sewer maintenance equipment OR one year of experience as a laborer in a public works department (for Sewer Repairer 1) AND one year of experience in the installation, repair, and maintenance of water mains, pipes, valves, hydrants, and other water service equipment and/or in the operation of water treatment plant apparatus and/or in varied plumbing work OR one year of experience as a laborer in a public works department (for Water Repairer 1). As there were no admitted applicants, the examination was canceled on June 10, 2021.

On his application, the appellant listed one position, Laborer 1, from April 2018 to the October 2020 closing date. He was credited with one year, six months of applicable experience and was found to be lacking six months of experience as a Laborer 1.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant argues that he has the required experience.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date.

N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisInitially, the appellant was correctly found ineligible for the subject examination. However, in this case, the examination was cancelled, the appellant continues to serve provisionally in the title under test, and he has accrued at least six months of experience as a provisional in the subject title since his appointment. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) to accept the appellant’s additional experience in his provisional position beyond the closing date, and admit him to the examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the examination cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.