John Waverka, CSC Docket No. 2021-828
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 17, 2021, CSC Docket No. 2021-828: examination scoring or administration, granted. John Waverka appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not have the required amount of service in a competitive title for the prom
Commission decisions · Meeting of February 17, 2021
John Waverka appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not have the required amount of service in a competitive title for the promotional examination for Equipment Operator (PC2774B), Ocean County.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- February 17, 2021, item B-18
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- EQUIPMENT OPERATOR
- Employer
- Ocean County
- Examination
- PC2774B
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-018 02-17-20.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundJohn Waverka appeals the decision of the Division of Agency Services which found that he did not have the required amount of service in a competitive title for the promotional examination for Equipment Operator (PC2774B), Ocean County.
The subject examination had a closing date of October 21, 2020, and was open to employees in the competitive division who possessed an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service in any competitive title as of the closing date, and who met the requirements of one year of experience in the operation and maintenance of construction and maintenance equipment. The appellant submitted an application with two positions, Maintenance Worker 2 Grounds from November 7, 2019 to the October 21, 2020 closing date, and Maintenance Worker 1 Grounds, a title in the noncompetitive division. He was found to not be not permanent in the competitive division. Although he was permanent as a Maintenance Worker 2 Grounds, which is a title in the competitive division, he lacked one year of continuous permanent service in the competitive division as of the closing date. On appeal, the appellant provides descriptions of his duties in his Maintenance Worker positions, and in his provisional position as an Equipment Operator to which he was appointed after the closing date. As the appellant was the sole applicant, the examination was canceled on December 13, 2020.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a)1 states that applicants for promotional examinations shall, by the closing date, meet the criteria of having one year of continuous permanent service for an aggregate of one year immediately preceding the closing date in a title or titles to which the examination is open.
AnalysisThe appellant was denied admittance to the subject examination since he fell 17 days short of one year of continuous permanent service in a competitive title as of the October 21, 2020 closing date. Nonetheless, the appellant was the sole applicant and the examination was canceled for a lack of admitted candidates. As of November 7, 2020 and the appellant had accrued one year of permanent service in a competitive title, and on November 9, 2020, the appellant was provisionally appointed to the title under test. Additionally, the appellant accrued at least one year of experience in the operation and maintenance of construction and maintenance equipment as of the closing date as a permanent and provisional Maintenance Worker 2 Grounds. Based on these unique circumstances, the appellant’s experience after the closing date should be accepted, the examination cancellation rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed. This shall not be precedent in any other matter.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.