NJ Civil Service Navigator

Michael Newell, CSC Docket No. 2022-1123

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 16, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-1123: examination scoring or administration, denied. Michael Newell requests permission to file a late application for the promotional examination for Police Sergeant (PM4662C), Ventnor.

Commission decisions · Meeting of February 16, 2022

Michael Newell requests permission to file a late application for the promotional examination for Police Sergeant (PM4662C), Ventnor.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
February 16, 2022, item B-9
Outcome
Denied
Title
POLICE SERGEANT
Employer
Ventnor City
Examination
PM4662C
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-009 02-16-22 LAD.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentMichael Newell requests permission to file a late application for the promotional examination for Police Sergeant (PM4662C), Ventnor.

BackgroundBy way of background, the subject examination was announced on October 1, 2021, with an application filing deadline of October 21, 2021, and all applications had to be received by 4:00 p.m. on that date.

Appellant's argumentThe petitioner, in support of his request, states that he failed to complete an application during the application period because it was one of the more stressful, exhausting and demanding periods of his career. Specifically, during the application period, he was assigned to an overnight shift that ran between midnight and 8:00 a.m. In addition, he was required to work a number of additional shifts because of short staffing in the Ventnor Police Department. As such, he only had three days off during the month of October. He also states that during this period, a typical day would involve coming home very tired and sleeping into the evening, completing homework for college classes he was taking in pursuit of a Bachelor’s degree and preparing for his midnight shift. Additionally, he advises that he was preparing to attend the Policemen’s Benevolent Association (PBA) convention in San Diego, California as President of PBA Local No. 97. Moreover, he notes that he spent a significant sum on a preparatory course for the subject examination because he strives to be a leader to his fellow officers in his department. He acknowledges that he made a mistake by failing to apply for the subject examination but asks for a second chance to sign up for it because he was overwhelmed by the foregoing circumstances. In support, he submits a copy of his shift schedule for October 2021, documentation related to his attendance at the PBA convention, and proof of his enrollment in an examination preparation course.

The appointing authority has advised that it provided the petitioner with a copy of the announcement for the PM4662C examination on October 1, 2021, and he signed a form acknowledging that he received this announcement on that date.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a)4 provides that applicants for promotional examinations shall submit an application on or before the announced application filing date. This provision is necessary for Agency Services to properly process the voluminous applications it receives for various examinations. See In the Matter of Andrew Romeo (MSB, decided September 22, 2004). N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) states that unless otherwise provided for by the Chairperson or designee, applications for open competitive and promotional examinations shall be submitted to the Civil Service Commission (Commission) no later than 4:00 p.m. on the announced application filing date.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, applications for the subject promotional examination were due by the application filing deadline of October 21, 2021. Although the petitioner describes an unfortunate set of circumstances, there does not appear to be a basis to relax the above-noted requirement. In this regard, the petitioner explains that due to his work schedule, coursework and other personal commitments during the application period, including attendance at a PBA convention, he was unable to complete an application. The Commission notes that the application for the subject examination was an abbreviated form. Specifically, the announcement for the PM4662C examination stated, in pertinent part:

Please note: An abbreviated, 1-page application is being used for this announcement. No detailed information regarding your education, experience, training, etc. is required. Please do not send any additional documents (transcripts, resumes, etc.) to the NJCSC (emphasis in original).

Additionally, the Commission observes that the personal circumstances the petitioner describes were all the types of reasonably foreseeable challenges that an incumbent in the title of Police Officer would be expected to anticipate and manage. In this regard, an incumbent in the title of Police Officer may reasonably anticipate the need to work an overnight shift and/or cover extra shifts. Moreover, the other obligations the petitioner describes, including those related to serving as a PBA President, attending a PBA convention and completing educational courses are the sorts of ongoing voluntary commitments that an applicant is reasonably expected to balance with a requirement that they file an application for an examination. As such, it cannot be said that the application requirement for the subject examination under the above-noted circumstances was unduly burdensome, particularly with the three- week application window provided to applicants to file an abbreviated application for the subject examination. Accordingly, based upon the foregoing, there is not a sufficient basis to relax the above-noted requirement.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • In the Matter of Andrew Romeo (September 22, 2004)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.