NJ Civil Service Navigator

Omar Howard, CSC Docket No. 2022-1534

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 18, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-1534: examination eligibility, granted. Omar Howard appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services, which found that he was ineligible for the promotional examination for Deputy Chief Investigator (PS6624I), Depa

Commission decisions · Meeting of May 18, 2022

Omar Howard appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services, which found that he was ineligible for the promotional examination for Deputy Chief Investigator (PS6624I), Department of Corrections on the basis that he was not permanent in a title to which the examination was open as of the closing date.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
May 18, 2022, item B-20
Outcome
Granted
Employer
Corrections
Examination
PS6624I
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-020 5-18-22 EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundOmar Howard appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services), which found that he was ineligible for the promotional examination for Deputy Chief Investigator (PS6624I), Department of Corrections (DOC) on the basis that he was not permanent in a title to which the examination was open as of the closing date.

By way of background, the subject examination was announced on October 1, 2021, with a closing date of October 21, 2021. The subject examination was open to employees serving in the titles of Assistant Chief Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities, and Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities, with an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date. A total of five eligibles have been admitted to the subject examination, which has not yet been administered.

The Commission previously approved the appellant’s retroactive permanent appointment date to the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities, effective January 4, 2020, upon the successful completion of a working test period, in order to effectuate a legal settlement between the appellant and the appointing authority. See In the Matter of Omar Howard (CSC, decided August 4, 2021). Thereafter, the appellant’s permanent appointment to the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities, was recorded, effective September 25, 2021. Agency Services deemed the appellant ineligible for the subject examination, as he had not completed his working test period and was not considered permanent in the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities as of the closing date.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant states that the DOC was preparing to permanently appoint him from the Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities (PS2734I), DOC eligible list when an incident occurred that resulted in disciplinary charges which delayed and later stopped his promotional appointment.1 Subsequently, the appointing authority withdrew the charges at issue, which led to his promotion from the revived PS2734I eligible list. He argues that the retroactive permanent appointment date of January 4, 2020, for his appointment to the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities put him well within the requirement of serving in that title and having one year of continuous permanent service in that title as of the closing date. He also asserts that despite the Commission’s August 4, 2021, order, his appointment to the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities was not effectuated until September 25, 2021. He contends that if his appointment and working test period had not been delayed, he would not have been deemed ineligible for the PS6624I examination.

Appointing authority's argumentThe appointing authority states that it supports the instant appeal, noting that the appellant now has a seniority date of January 4, 2020, in the title of Principal Investigator Secured Parole and Secured Facilities. It also asserts that the limited number of candidates eligible for the PS6624I examination and the two vacancies it will have in the subject title within the next six months also support the appellant’s admission to the subject examination.

BackgroundAgency records indicate that the appellant completed his working test period on January 25, 2022.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a)1 provides that applicants shall have one year of continuous permanent service for an aggregate of one year immediately preceding the closing date in a title or titles to which the examination is open. N.J.A.C. 4A:1- 1.2 provides that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisIn the instant matter, Agency Services properly deemed the appellant ineligible. In this regard, because his working test period was in progress as of the October 21, 2021, closing date, per the Commission’s August 4, 2021, order, he had not yet fulfilled the necessary condition for his retroactive appointment to the title of

1 It is noted that the appointing authority acknowledged this in In the Matter of Omar Howard (CSC, decided August 4, 2021).

Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities to become permanent. Further, even if the appellant’s working test period had commenced as of August 4, 2021, he still would have been serving in the working test period as of the October 29, 2021, closing date for the PS6624I examination. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-5.3(b)2 (noting that in State service, the length of the working test period is four months).

Nevertheless, the Commission observes that the appellant has successfully completed his working test period, meaning that his retroactive appointment, effective January 4, 2020, to the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities has become permanent. As a result, the appellant can now be said to have been permanent in the title of Principal Investigator Parole and Secured Facilities as of the closing date for the subject examination. Moreover, the Commission observes that the appointing authority supports the instant appeal. The Commission notes that the dual purpose of the Civil Service system is to ensure efficient public service for State and local governments and to provide appointment and advancement opportunities to Civil service employees based on their merit and abilities. These interests are best served when more, rather than fewer, individuals are presented with employment opportunities. See Communications Workers of America v. New Jersey Department of Personnel, 154 N.J. 121 (1998). Under these circumstances, good cause exists to relax N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a)1 and admit the appellant to the subject examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted and the appellant be admitted to the subject examination.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.