NJ Civil Service Navigator

Maritza Gonzalez, CSC Docket No. 2022-2117

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of April 27, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-2117: examination eligibility, granted. Maritza Gonzalez appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the licensing requirements for the open competitive examination for Technical Assist

Commission decisions · Meeting of April 27, 2022

Maritza Gonzalez appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services that she did not meet the licensing requirements for the open competitive examination for Technical Assistant to the Construction Official (M0608C), Clifton.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
April 27, 2022, item B-29
Outcome
Granted
Title
TECHNICAL ASSISTANT TO THE CONSTRUCTION OFFICIAL
Employer
Clifton
Examination
M0608C
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-029 04-27-22 EG.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundMaritza Gonzalez appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) that she did not meet the licensing requirements for the open competitive examination for Technical Assistant to the Construction Official (M0608C), Clifton.

The subject examination had a November 22, 2021, closing date. The experience requirements were two years in work involving the processing, review and issuance of construction permits. The license requirement was possession of a valid New Jersey Uniform Construction Code Certification as a Technical Assistant to Construction Official issued by the State’s Department of Community Affairs (DCA). A total of two candidates applied for the subject examination and one was found eligible. Certification OL220288 was issued, and its disposition is due June 14, 2022.

On the appellant’s application, she listed that she was a provisional in the subject title from February 2021 to the closing date and a Keyboarding Clerk 1 from February 2019 to February 2021. Agency Services credited her with two years and nine months applicable experience. She also listed her Technical Assistant certification with an expiration date of November 2, 2021. Agency Services determined that she was not eligible as she did not possess the required certification as of the closing date, as it had expired.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant states that she is a certified Technical Assistant to the Construction Official and has been working in the building department for three years. She presents that she has completed the Technical Assistant course on May 15, 2020. The appellant asserts that she is also registered with DCA’s Division of Codes and Standards and submits her current certification, which has an effective date of March 7, 2022.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.3(b) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the open competitive announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1- 1.2(c) states that the Civil Service Commission (Commission) may relax a rule for good cause in order to effectuate the purpose of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes. N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that the appellant has the burden of proof in examination appeals.

AnalysisIn this matter, Agency Services correctly determined that the appellant was ineligible as she did not have a valid New Jersey Uniform Construction Code Certification as a Technical Assistant to a Construction Official issued by DCA by the November 22, 2021, closing date. However, on appeal, the appellant provides proof that she reobtained the required license after the closing date. Additionally, the eligible list is incomplete as it only contains one name. Therefore, the Commission finds good cause under N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4- 2.3(b) and accept the appellant’s certification that was effective after the closing date, for eligibility purposes only, and admit her to the subject examination.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the appeal be granted, and the appellant’s application be processed for prospective employment opportunities only.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.