Ayomide T. Adebayo, CSC Docket No. 2022-2652
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 2, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-2652: removal from an eligible list, granted. Ayomide T. Adebayo appeals the determination of Middlesex County to remove his name from the eligible list for Graphic Artist 1 (C0187A), on the basis that he failed to complet
Commission decisions · Meeting of November 2, 2022
Ayomide T. Adebayo appeals the determination of Middlesex County to remove his name from the eligible list for Graphic Artist 1 (C0187A), on the basis that he failed to complete pre-employment processing.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- November 2, 2022, item B-3
- Outcome
- Granted
- Stated ground
- Did not respond or appear
- Title
- GRAPHIC ARTIST 1
- Examination
- C0187A
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-003 11-02-2022 LRG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundAyomide T. Adebayo appeals the determination of Middlesex County to remove his name from the eligible list for Graphic Artist 1 (C0187A), on the basis that he failed to complete pre-employment processing.
The appellant, a non-veteran, took and passed the open competitive examination for Graphic Artist 1 (C0187A), which had a closing date of March 7, 2019. The resulting eligible list promulgated on August 22, 2019 and expired on August 21, 2022. The appointing authority indicates that Adebayo was notified by email that he needed to respond to schedule an interview by February 4, 2022.
On appeal, Adebayo claims that he attended the Microsoft Teams meeting on February 10, 2022, for an interview but did not hear anything further from the appointing authority regarding the Graphic Artist (C0187A) position. In support, Adebayo submits various emails with the appointing authority, including an email containing a link for a Microsoft Teams meeting, scheduled for 1:00 p.m. on February 10, 2022.
Despite an opportunity to do so, the appointing authority did not submit a response.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for “non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification.” N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b), in conjunction with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(d), provides that the appellant has the burden of proof to show by a preponderance of the evidence that an appointing authority’s decision to remove his name from an eligible list was in error. Additionally, N.J.S.A. 11A:4-6 and N.J.A.C. 4A:4-3.4 provide that an eligible list may be revived in order to implement a court order or decision of the Civil Service Commission in the event of a successful appeal instituted during the life of a list, to correct an administrative error, or for other good cause.
AnalysisIn the instant matter, the appellant submitted all email responses between himself and the appointing authority as to the time and date the interview was scheduled. The appellant maintains that he attended the interview but did not hear anything further from the appointing authority. In support, the appellant submitted proof that the interview was scheduled. Moreover, the appointing authority has not provided any evidence to dispute the appellant’s claims. Thus, it is appropriate that his name be restored to the subject eligible list.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted and the eligible list for Graphic Artist 1 (C0187A), Middlesex County be revived, Adebayo’s name be restored and that his name be certified at the time of the next certification only for prospective employment opportunity.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.