Harshad Patel, CSC Docket No. 2022-3206
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 20, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-3206: examination scoring or administration, granted. Harshad Patel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services denying his request for a make-up for the promotional examination for Supervising Highway Engine
Commission decisions · Meeting of July 20, 2022
Harshad Patel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services denying his request for a make-up for the promotional examination for Supervising Highway Engineer, Bridge Design Specification Review (PS7847T), Department of Transportation.
- Matter
- Examination scoring or administration
- Decided
- July 20, 2022, item B-14
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- SUPERVISING HIGHWAY ENGINEER, BRIDGE DESIGN, SPECIFICATION REVIEW
- Employer
- Transportation
- Examination
- PS7847T
- Chair at the time
- Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
- Official decision
- Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-014 7-22-20 TAMUG.pdf)
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundHarshad Patel appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services denying his request for a make-up for the promotional examination for Supervising Highway Engineer, Bridge Design Specification Review (PS7847T), Department of Transportation.
By way of background, the subject announcement was issued on January 1, 2022, with a January 21, 2022, closing date. A total of 12 employees applied and 10 were admitted. Notices dated May 12, 2022, informed candidates that the subject test was to be administered on June 4, 2022. A total of six employees took the test and four were “no shows,” including the appellant. No certifications have been issued and the list has not yet promulgated.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal, the appellant presents that he received notice on May 20, 2022, indicating that the subject test was to be administered on June 4, 2022. However, he states that he booked an out-of-the country family vacation in April 2022 that was non-refundable that was scheduled for May 31, 2022, to June 10, 2022. The appellant asserts that he expected that he would have been given sufficient notice regarding the test administration date before planning the trip, but he never received such notice. The appellant submits documentation to show that his supervisor approved his vacation, he purchased airfare and hotel rooms, and his vacation itinerary.
CONCLUSION
N.J.A.C. 4A:4.2.9(b) provides, in pertinent part, that for professional level engineering, make-up examinations may be authorized only in cases of:
1. Debilitating injury or illness requiring an extended convalescent period, provided the candidate submits a doctor's certification containing a diagnosis and a statement clearly showing that the candidate's physical condition precluded his or her participation in the examination;
2. Death in the candidate's immediate family as evidenced by a copy of the death certificate;
3. A candidate's wedding which cannot be reasonably changed as evidenced by relevant documentation;
4. When required for certain persons returning from military service (see N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.6A); or
5. Error by the Civil Service Commission (Commission) or appointing authority.
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) provides that a Commission rule may be relaxed for good cause in a particular situation, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.
AnalysisIn the present matter, the appellant indicates that in April 2022, he booked an out-of-the country family vacation that was scheduled from May 31, 2022, to June 10, 2022. The subject announcement, which issued on January 1, 2022, did not indicate a tentative test date. By notices dated May 12, 2022, candidates were informed that the test would be administered on June 4, 2022. As a result, the appellant was unable to cancel his vacation plans or make arrangements to return to New Jersey solely for the purpose of taking the test.1 Although the information the appellant presents does not technically meet the criteria for a make-up pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9, good cause exists to relax the controlling regulation given the unique circumstances presented. Thus, the appellant should be provided with a make-up for the subject examination. See In the Matter of Nicholas DeLeon (CSC, decided May 23, 2018) and In the Matter of Rachel Baum (CSC, decided October 18, 2017).
Rule1 It is noted that N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9(a) provides, in pertinent part, that make-up examinations, except for professional level engineering promotional examinations and public safety open competitive and promotional examinations may be authorized for prior vacation or travel plans outside of New Jersey or any contiguous state which cannot be reasonably changed, as evidence by a sworn statement and relevant documentation.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- In the Matter of Nicholas DeLeon (May 23, 2018)
- In the Matter of Rachel Baum (October 18, 2017)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.