NJ Civil Service Navigator

Nazha Hanafi, CSC Docket No. 2022-855

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 19, 2022, CSC Docket No. 2022-855: removal from an eligible list, denied. Nazha Hanafi appeals the removal from the eligible list for Motor Vehicle Operator 1 - 10 months (S1094A), Statewide, due to her failure to respond to the certification notice.

Commission decisions · Meeting of January 19, 2022

Nazha Hanafi appeals the removal from the eligible list for Motor Vehicle Operator 1 - 10 months (S1094A), Statewide, due to her failure to respond to the certification notice.

Matter
Removal from an eligible list
Decided
January 19, 2022, item B-13
Outcome
Denied
Stated ground
Driving record, Did not respond or appear
Examination
S1094A
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-013 01-19-22 LRD.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundNazha Hanafi appeals the removal from the eligible list for Motor Vehicle Operator 10 months (S1094A), Statewide, due to her failure to respond to the certification notice.

By way of background, the appellant’s name appeared on the Motor Vehicle Operator 1 to 10 months (S1094A) eligible list and was certified to Montclair State University on July 14, 2021. In disposing of the certification (OS210230), the appointing authority removed the appellant’s name from the subject list for failure to respond to the Notification of Certification, dated July 21, 2021.

The appellant appealed her removal from the eligible list, stating that she left the country on September 4, 2021, and when she returned on October 2, 2021, she found the notice. She provided proof of her travel.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for “non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification.”

N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b) provides that an appellant has the burden of proof to show that an appointing authority’s decision to remove the appellant’s name from an eligible list was in error.

AnalysisIn this matter, the appellant states that she was out of the country from September 4, 2021 to October 2, 2021, which is after the timeframe that she was required to respond to the Notification of Certification dated July 21, 2021. The certification notice specifically advises eligibles to respond in writing within 5 business days of receipt. Instead, the appellant waited until she received a Certification Disposition Notice, dated September 13, 2021, which informed her that she did not reply to the Notification of Certification and which provided appeal information. Moreover, there is no evidence that the appellant did not receive the Notification of Certification, and the appellant did not explain why she did not respond in July 2021.

Accordingly, the appellant has not met her burden of proof in this matter and the appointing authority had sufficient cause for removing her name from the eligible list for Motor Vehicle Operator 1 to 10 months (S1094A), Statewide.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.