NJ Civil Service Navigator

Covvie Scott, CSC Docket No. 2023-1091

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 3, 2024, CSC Docket No. 2023-1091: discrimination, retaliation or state policy, penalty reversed. Covvie Scott, Senior Building Maintenance Worker, Low Pressure License, Trenton Public Library, removal, effective October 20, 2022, on charges of conduct un

Commission decisions · Meeting of July 3, 2024

Covvie Scott, Senior Building Maintenance Worker, Low Pressure License, Trenton Public Library, removal, effective October 20, 2022, on charges of conduct unbecoming a public employee and discrimination.

Matter
Discrimination, retaliation or State Policy
Decided
July 3, 2024, item A-6
Outcome
Penalty reversed
ALJ's recommendation
Reverse the removal.
What the Commission did with it
Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
Penalty appealed
removal
Title
SENIOR BUILDING MAINTENANCE WORKER
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

CSC published this decision as a scanned image. The text below was recognized by OCR, read twice and checked against the meeting minutes, but OCR can misread a word. The official document is the record.

BackgroundThe appeal of Covvie Scott, Senior Building Maintenance Worker, Low Pressure License, Trenton Public Library, removal, effective October 20, 2022, on charges, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Judith Lieberman (ALJ), who rendered her initial decision on May 28, 2024. Exceptions were filed on behalf of the appointing authority and a reply to exceptions was filed on behalf of the appellant.

AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ's initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, including a thorough review of the exceptions and reply, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), at its meeting on July 3, 2024 adopted the ALJ’s Findings of Facts and Conclusions of Law and her recommendation to reverse the removal.

As indicated above, the Commission has reviewed the appointing authority’s exceptions in this matter and finds them wholly unpersuasive. It makes the following comment. The burden of proof in a disciplinary matter is on the appointing authority to show by a preponderance of the credible evidence in the record that the proffered charges are sustainable. For all the reasons expressed by the ALJ in her initial decision, the Commission agrees that the appointing authority has fallen short of this burden in this matter.

Since the removal has been reversed, the appellant is entitled to be reinstated with mitigated back pay, benefits, and seniority pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10 from the first date of separation without pay until the date of reinstatement. Moreover, as the removal has been reversed, the appellant is entitled to reasonable counsel fees pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12.

This decision resolves the merits of the dispute between the parties concerning the disciplinary charges and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority. However, per the Appellate Division’s decision, Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections, Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (App. Div. Feb. 26, 2003), the Commission’s decision will not become final until any outstanding issues concerning back pay or counsel fees are finally resolved. In the interim, as the court states in Phillips, supra, if it has not already done so, upon receipt of this decision, the appointing authority shall immediately reinstate the appellant to his position.

ORDER

The Civil Service Commission finds that the action of the appointing authority in removing the appellant was not justified. The Commission therefore reverses that action and grants the appeal of Covvie Scott. The Commission further orders that the appellant be granted back pay, benefits, and seniority from the first date of separation without pay until the date of reinstatement. The amount of back pay awarded is to be reduced and mitigated as provided for in N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10. Proof of income earned, and an affidavit of mitigation shall be submitted by or on behalf of the appellant to the appointing authority within 30 days of issuance of this decision.

The Commission further orders that counsel fees be awarded to the attorney for the appellant pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. An affidavit of services in support of reasonable counsel fees shall be submitted by or on behalf of the appellant to the appointing authority within 30 days of issuance of this decision. Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10 and N.J.A.C. 4A:2.12, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any dispute as to the amount of back pay and counsel fees. However, under no circumstances should the appellant’s reinstatement be delayed pending resolution of any potential back pay or counsel fee dispute.

The parties must inform the Commission, in writing, if there is any dispute as to back pay or counsel fees within 60 days of issuance of this decision. In the absence of such notice, the Commission will assume that all outstanding issues have been amicably resolved by the parties and this decision shall become a final administrative determination pursuant to R. 2:2-3(a)(2). After such time, any further review of this matter shail be pursued in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decisions this one cites

  • Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (February 26, 2003)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it by OCR and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.