NJ Civil Service Navigator

Jonathan Arocho, CSC Docket No. 2023-187

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of March 15, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2023-187: examination scoring or administration, denied. Jonathan Arocho requests a make-up for the open competitive examination for Sheriff’s Officer (C0218D), Essex County.

Commission decisions · Meeting of March 15, 2023

Jonathan Arocho requests a make-up for the open competitive examination for Sheriff’s Officer (C0218D), Essex County.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
March 15, 2023, item B-9
Outcome
Denied
Title
SHERIFF'S OFFICER
Employer
Essex County
Examination
C0218D
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

Appellant's argumentJonathan Arocho requests a make-up for the open competitive examination for Sheriff’s Officer (C0218D), Essex County.

BackgroundBy way of background, the subject announcement was issued on January 3, 2022, with an application filing deadline of February 28, 2022. A notice dated May 19, 2022, was sent to the appellant, advising him that the subject test was to be administered on July 14, 2022 at 6:00 p.m. and that he was assigned to the Essex County College testing site. On July 14, 2022, the appellant completed a Test Administration Appeal/Comment Form, in which he requested a make-up test, stating that he "apologize[d] for arriving late, due to traffic and not being able to find the main entrance of the building.”

It is noted that the Center Supervisor keeps notes of incidents which occur at the testing center, and, in this case, he noted his interaction with the appellant. He stated that the appellant arrived at the testing center at 6:20 p.m., was not tested, wished to file an appeal and did so.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9(a) provides make-up examinations for open competitive and general promotional testing, except for professional level engineering promotional examinations and public safety promotional examinations under (b) below, may be authorized for the following reasons:

1. Error by the Civil Service Commission or appointing authority;

Analysis2. Serious illness or disability of the candidate on the test date, provided the candidate submits a doctor's certificate specifying that the candidate was not able to take the test on that day for medical reasons;

3. Documented serious illness or death in the candidate's immediate family;

4. Natural disaster;

5. Prior vacation or travel plans outside of New Jersey or any contiguous state, which cannot be reasonably changed, as evidenced by a sworn statement and relevant documentation;

6. When required for certain persons returning from military service (see N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.6A); and

7. Other valid reasons.

Additionally, N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.8 (scheduling of examinations) states, in relevant part, that candidates shall be at the examination site at the designated time, and that candidates for written or computer-based examinations or examinations containing written and performance parts shall be admitted to the examination if they arrive at the test room within 15 minutes after the designated time.

In the instant matter, the record establishes that the appellant was scheduled to take the subject examination on July 14, 2022, and did not do so. The examination was scheduled for 6:00 p.m. and the appellant did not arrive at the test room within 15 minutes of this time. In order to assist candidates, this agency’s website provides directions to the various test centers located throughout the State, the Arrival Times/Late policy, as well as an information phone number that candidates can call for directions. In addition, the test notification that all candidates receive scheduling them for a particular examination clearly provides the name and address of the testing facility. Notwithstanding advisory information provided to prospective candidates, the ultimate responsibility for getting to a test room on time can only rest with each candidate. See In the Matter of Ryan Lee (CSC, decided January 18, 2017).

The appellant has not met the criteria for a make-up examination in this matter. The documentation does not establish that the appellant met the make-up criteria outlined in N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.9. As noted above, the ultimate responsibility for getting to a test room on time can only rest with each candidate. As such, it cannot be said that the foregoing circumstances provide a basis to grant the appellant’s request for a make-up examination.

A thorough review of the record indicates that the appellant has failed to meet his burden of proof in this matter.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • In the Matter of Ryan Lee (January 18, 2017)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.