the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority, CSC Docket No. 2023-2161
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of June 7, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2023-2161: matter, granted. Plainfield requests that the former employees of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority be recorded as permanent employees with Plainfield, effective July 1, 2022.
Commission decisions · Meeting of June 7, 2023
Plainfield requests that the former employees of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority be recorded as permanent employees with Plainfield, effective July 1, 2022.
- Matter
- Not classified
- Decided
- June 7, 2023, item B-9
- Outcome
- Granted
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundPlainfield requests that the former employees of the Plainfield Municipal Utilities Authority (PMUA) be recorded as permanent employees with Plainfield, effective July 1, 2022.
By way of background, on June 30, 2022, Plainfield passed an ordinance for the dissolution of the PMUA, a non-Civil Service agency, and the “absorption” of its employees. It thereafter requested permanent appointments for the employees. The Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) conducted a review of the position classification of the PMUA employees and their years of service to determine the proper placement of the employees in Plainfield. As set forth in the attached spreadsheet, Agency Services has proposed appropriate job titles in the career service for each position and presents that all of the PMUA employees have worked for one year or more with the PMUA prior to the July 1, 2022 effective date. Agency Services supports Plainfield’s request to record the employees’ permanent appointment in its Department of Public Works1 and indicates that the Local Finance Board also granted approval of the movement. Moreover, Agency Services states that there are no applicable special reemployment lists which would prevent the appointment of the employees.
1 The ordinance also calls for the possible creation of a Sewer and Solid Waste Utility in Plainfield which would house the employees.
CONCLUSION
Initially, the Civil Service Commission (Commission) notes that the Legislature made substantial changes to the laws governing the sharing of services and consolidation of local governments. See P.L. 2007, c. 63, P.L. 2013, c.166, and P.L. 2018, c.140. These changes included the repeal of N.J.S.A. 11A:9-8, which had stated that “[w]hen the functions of two or more political subdivisions are consolidated, and any one of the political subdivisions shall be operating under [Title 11A, Civil Service Act] at the time of such consolidation, the other political subdivision or subdivisions shall be deemed to have adopted this title with regard to the consolidated functions.” The changes included the enactment of the “Uniform Shared Services and Consolidation Act”(Act), N.J.S.A. 40A:65-1, et seq., which was then supplemented with the “Common Sense Shared Services Pilot Program” (Pilot Program), N.J.S.A. 40A:65-4.1, et seq., that established a pilot program in seven counties to evaluate the efficiencies related to the sharing of services of certain local personnel.
However, the movement of the former PMUA employees would not be the type of arrangement contemplated by the Act or the Pilot Program. Rather, in this case, the PMUA was dissolved, and its employees, in essence, simply ceased to be employed with that entity. Thus, the “absorption” of the PMUA employees into Plainfield constitutes new appointments. Plainfield requests that such appointments be recorded as permanent. In that regard, N.J.A.C. 4A:4-1.10(c) provides that “[w]hen a regular appointment has been made, the [Commission] may order a retroactive appointment date due to administrative error, administrative delay or other good cause, on notice to affected parties.” Further, the method by which an individual can achieve permanent appointment in the competitive division is if the individual applies for and passes an examination, is appointed from an eligible list, and satisfactorily completes a working test period. However, in the present case, it would be inequitable and possibly detrimental for the employees who have all worked in the PMUA for more than one year to compete in an open competitive examination situation, and conceivably be displaced, in order to secure a position for which they have already clearly demonstrated their merit and fitness to perform.
In these unique circumstances, while N.J.S.A. 11A:9-9 does not precisely mirror the present situation, its application is instructive. N.J.S.A. 11A:9-9 provides that “[a]ny employee of a political subdivision who, at the time of adoption of [Title 11A], was actively employed by the political subdivision continuously for a period of at least one year prior to the adoption of [Title 11A], or any employee who was on an approved leave of absence and had at least one year of continuous service with the political subdivision prior to the adoption of [Title 11A], and who comes within the career service, shall continue to hold such position, and shall not be removed except in accordance with the provisions contained in [Title 11A].” See also N.J.A.C. 4A:9- 1.1(b). In the present case, the PMUA employees have come within the career service by virtue of their agency’s dissolution and the utilization of their positions within Plainfield, a jurisdiction that has adopted Title 11A. Accordingly, under these circumstances, good cause has been presented to grant Plainfield’s request to record the permanent appointments of the former PMUA employees in its Department of Public Works effective July 1, 2022.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this request be granted.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.