NJ Civil Service Navigator

T.T., CSC Docket No. 2023-2197, 2024-1626

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 3, 2024, CSC Docket No. 2023-2197: request for reconsideration, different results for different parties. T.T. appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Teaneck and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1873W).

Commission decisions · Meeting of July 3, 2024

T.T. appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Teaneck and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1873W). Additionally, Teaneck, represented by Mark A. Tabakin, Esq., requests reconsideration of the Civil Service Commission’s assessment of costs in In the Matter of T.T. (CSC, decided January 17, 2024).

Matter
Request for reconsideration
Decided
July 3, 2024, item B-7
Outcome
Different results for different parties
Title
FIRE FIGHTER
Examination
M1873W
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that the appeal be granted and the request for reconsideration be denied.

This docket at the Commission

  1. January 17, 2024, item B-1Referred for further reviewThe Civil Service Commission referred the matter for an independent psychological examination.
  2. July 3, 2024, item B-7Different results for different partiesThe Civil Service Commission directed that the appeal be granted and the request for reconsideration be denied.

The decision

BackgroundT.T. appeals his rejection as a Fire Fighter candidate by Teaneck and its request to remove his name from the eligible list for Fire Fighter (M1873W) on the basis of psychological unfitness to perform effectively the duties of the position. Additionally, the appointing authority, represented by Mark A. Tabakin, Esq., requests reconsideration of the Civil Service Commission’s (Commission) assessment of costs in In the Matter of T.T. (CSC, decided January 17, 2024).

The appeal was referred for independent evaluation by the Commission in a

Decisions this one cites

Later decisions that cite this one

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.