NJ Civil Service Navigator

Damiana Padilla , CSC Docket No. 2023-2205

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of September 10, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2023-2205: discipline, penalty reversed. Damiana Padilla, Human Services Specialist 2, Bilingual, six-month suspension, on charges of conduct unbecoming a public employee, insubordination and other sufficient cause.

Commission decisions · Meeting of September 10, 2025

Damiana Padilla, Human Services Specialist 2, Bilingual, six-month suspension, on charges of conduct unbecoming a public employee, insubordination and other sufficient cause.

Matter
Discipline
Decided
September 10, 2025, item A-6
Outcome
Penalty reversed
ALJ's recommendation
Reverse the six-month suspension.
What the Commission did with it
Adopted the ALJ's recommendation
Penalty appealed
suspension
Title
HUMAN SERVICES SPECIALIST 2
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission affirmed the recommendation of the Administrative Law Judge.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundThe appeal of Damiana Padilla, Human Services Specialist 2, Bilingual, Camden County Board of Social Services, six-month suspension, on charges, was heard by Administrative Law Judge Michael R. Stanzione (ALJ), who rendered his initial decision on July 31, 2025. No exceptions were filed.

AnalysisHaving considered the record and the ALJ’s initial decision, and having made an independent evaluation of the record, the Civil Service Commission (Commission), at its meeting on September 10, 2025, adopted the ALJ’s Findings of Fact and Conclusions and his recommendation to reverse the six-month suspension.

Since the suspension has been reversed, the appellant is entitled to six-months of mitigated back pay, benefits, and seniority pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10. She is also entitled to reasonable counsel fees pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12.

This decision resolves the merits of the dispute between the parties concerning the disciplinary charges and the penalty imposed by the appointing authority. However, per the Appellate Division’s decision, Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections, Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (App. Div. Feb. 26, 2003), the Commission’s decision will not become final until any outstanding issues concerning back pay or counsel fees are finally resolved.

ORDER

The Civil Service Commission finds that the action of the appointing authority in suspending the appellant was not justified. The Commission therefore reverses that action and grants the appeal of Damiana Padilla. The Commission further orders that the appellant be granted six months of back pay, benefits, and seniority.

The amount of back pay awarded is to be reduced and mitigated as provided for in N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10. Proof of income earned, and an affidavit of mitigation shall be submitted by or on behalf of the appellant to the appointing authority within 30 days of issuance of this decision.

Additionally, the Commission orders that counsel fees be awarded to the attorney for the appellant pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.12. An affidavit of services in support of reasonable counsel fees shall be submitted by or on behalf of the appellant to the appointing authority within 30 days of issuance of this decision.

Pursuant to N.J.A.C. 4A:2-2.10 and N.J.A.C. 4A:2.12, the parties shall make a good faith effort to resolve any dispute as to the amount of back pay and counsel fees.

The parties must inform the Commission, in writing, if there is any dispute as to back pay or counsel fees within 60 days of issuance of this decision. In the absence of such notice, the Commission will assume that all outstanding issues have been amicably resolved by the parties and this decision shall become a final administrative determination pursuant to R. 2:2-3(a)(2). After such time, any further review of this matter shall be pursued in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decisions this one cites

  • Dolores Phillips v. Department of Corrections Docket No. A-5581-01T2F (February 26, 2003)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.