Toufic Hayek, CSC Docket No. 2023-545
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of January 18, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2023-545: removal from an eligible list, granted. Toufic Hayek, Jr., appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Police Sergeant (PM0896V), Woodland Park on the basis that he failed to respond to the certificatio
Commission decisions · Meeting of January 18, 2023
Toufic Hayek, Jr., appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Police Sergeant (PM0896V), Woodland Park on the basis that he failed to respond to the certification notice.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- January 18, 2023, item B-1
- Outcome
- Granted
- Stated ground
- Did not respond or appear
- Title
- POLICE SERGEANT
- Employer
- Woodland Park Borough
- Examination
- PM0896V
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundToufic Hayek, Jr., appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Police Sergeant (PM0896V), Woodland Park Borough on the basis that he failed to respond to the certification notice.
The appellant took and passed the promotional examination for Police Sergeant (PM0896V), which had a closing date of July 21, 2017. The resulting eligible list promulgated May 24, 2018 and expired on October 18, 2022. The appellant’s name was certified to the appointing authority on May 19, 2022, with a notice date of May 26, 2022. In disposing of the certification, the appointing authority requested the removal of the appellant’s name on the basis that he failed to respond to the certification notice.
Appellant's argumentIn support of his appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant submits a sworn, notarized statement indicating that he timely responded to the May 26, 2022 certification notice.
BackgroundDespite an opportunity to do so, the appointing authority did not submit a response.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for “non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification.” N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b), in conjunction with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(d), provides that the appellant has the burden of proof to show by a preponderance of the evidence that an appointing authority’s decision to remove his name from an eligible list was in error.
AnalysisThe appointing authority requested the removal of the appellant’s name from the subject eligible list on the basis of his failure to respond to the certification notice. However, the appellant has submitted a sworn, notarized statement, attesting to the fact that he timely responded to the certification notice. While there is a presumption that mail correctly addressed, stamped and mailed was received by the party to whom it was addressed, the appellant has rebutted that presumption in submitting his sworn, notarized statement. See SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State Department of Human Services, 146 N.J. 614 (1996); Szczesny v. Vasquez, 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354 (App. Div. 1962); In the Matter of Joseph Bahun, Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (App. Div. May 21, 2001). Thus, it is appropriate that his name be restored to the subject eligible list for prospective employment opportunities only.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted and the eligible list for Police Sergeant (PM0896V), Woodland Park Borough, be revived in order for the appellant to be considered at the time of the next certification for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
Decisions this one cites
- SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State Department of Human Services 146 N.J. 614
- Szczesny v. Vasquez 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354
- In the Matter of Joseph Bahun Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (May 21, 2001)
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.