NJ Civil Service Navigator

Family Service Worker (C1697D), CSC Docket No. 2024-483

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of November 1, 2023, CSC Docket No. 2024-483: certification or appointment, granted. Passaic County Board of Social Services requests permission not to make an appointment from the February 27, 2023, certification for Administrative Clerk (C1093D), Passaic County

Commission decisions · Meeting of November 1, 2023

Passaic County Board of Social Services requests permission not to make an appointment from the February 27, 2023, certification for Administrative Clerk (C1093D), Passaic County Board of Social Services.

Matter
Certification or appointment
Decided
November 1, 2023, item B-22
Outcome
Granted
Title
ADMINISTRATIVE CLERK
Employer
Passaic County Board of Social Services
Examination
C1093D, C1697D
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission granted the appointment waiver and deferred selection costs.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundBergen County requests permission not to make an appointment from the March 13, 2023 certification for Family Service Worker (C1697D), Bergen County.

The record reveals that Bergen County provisionally appointed Dana Sabatino, pending open competitive examination procedures, to the subject title effective July 18, 2022. An examination was announced with a closing date of December 21, 2022, that resulted in a list of six eligibles promulgating on March 9, 2023 and expiring on March 8, 2026. It is noted that Sabatino was separated from her provisional position when she was appointed permanently to the title of Family and Neighborhood Counselor effective June 19, 2023. Additionally, there are currently no employees serving provisionally pending open competitive examination procedures in the subject title with the appointing authority.

The appointing authority returned the subject certification and requested a waiver of the appointment requirement, as Sabatino was separated from her provisional position. Additionally, the appointing authority asserted that it will endeavor to utilize the subject eligible list before the March 8, 2026 expiration date.

The appointing authority’s request for an appointment waiver was acknowledged, and it was advised that if its request were granted, it could be assessed for the costs of the selection process in the amount of $2,048. Despite the opportunity, the appointing authority did not provide any additional information for the Civil Service Commission (Commission) to review.

CONCLUSION

In accordance with N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5, once the examination process has been initiated due to the appointment of a provisional employee or due to an appointing authority’s request to fill a vacancy, the appointing authority must make an appointment from the resulting eligible list if there are three or more interested and eligible candidates. The only exception to this mandate may be made for a valid reason such as fiscal constraints.

In the instant matter, the examination for the subject title was generated as a result of the provisional appointment of Sabatino. However, after a complete certification was issued, the appointing authority requested an appointment waiver after Sabatino was separated from her provisional position when she was appointed permanently to the title of Family and Neighborhood Counselor effective June 19, 2023. Thus, in conjunction with the fact that there are no provisionals currently serving, there is a sufficient justification for an appointment waiver.

Although an appointment waiver is granted in this matter, both N.J.S.A. 11A:4-5 and N.J.A.C. 4A:10-2.2(a)2 state that if an appointing authority receives permission not to make an appointment, it can be ordered to reimburse for the costs of the selection process. While administering examinations and providing the names of eligible job candidates to the jurisdictions under the Civil Service system are two of the primary activities of this agency, these costly efforts are thwarted when appointing authorities fail to utilize the resulting eligible lists to make appointments and candidates have needlessly expended their time, efforts and money to take these examinations in hopes of being considered for a permanent appointment. In this case, the Commission notes that the list in question will not expire until March 8, 2026. Further, the appointing authority has indicated that although an appointment will not be made at this time, it will endeavor to utilize the list prior to its expiration. Accordingly, under the particular circumstances of this matter, it would not be appropriate to assess the appointing authority for the costs of the selection process at this time. Nevertheless, in the event it fails to utilize the subject eligible list by its expiration date of March 8, 2026, this matter can be reviewed to ascertain whether an assessment for the costs of the selection process should be made.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that the request for the waiver of the appointment requirement be granted and no selection costs presently be assessed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.