NJ Civil Service Navigator

D.G., CSC Docket No. 2025-1880

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of July 2, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2025-1880: examination scoring or administration, denied. D.G. requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Fire Captain (PM1916G), Camden.

Commission decisions · Meeting of July 2, 2025

D.G. requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Fire Captain (PM1916G), Camden.

Matter
Examination scoring or administration
Decided
July 2, 2025, item B-9
Outcome
Denied
Title
FIRE CAPTAIN
Employer
Camden City
Examination
PM1916G
Chair at the time
Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
Official decision
CSC's PDF

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this request be denied.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundD.G. requests permission to submit a late application for the promotional examination for Fire Captain (PM1916G), City of Camden.

The announcement for the subject examination issued on February 1, 2025 with an application deadline of February 21, 2025. It was open, in pertinent part, to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of three years of continuous permanent service as of the closing date and were currently serving in the title of Fire Fighter. An abbreviated, one-page application was used for this announcement, and no detailed information regarding education, experience, training, etc., was required. Sixty-three applicants were admitted to the examination. The appellant did not submit an application. Agency records indicate that the appellant has served in the title of Fire Fighter since April 2004, with a period of layoff from January 2011 to April 2011.

Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant states that during the time of the application announcement process, he was out of work on medical family leave and “missed the opportunity to take part in the application process.” He states that he “[has] been out on family leave since . . . April [2024]. Although it was not continuous[,] I am my mother’s full time caregiver.” He states that “the test was annual on the 1st of the month.”1

Background1 Agency records indicate that the appellant has applied for Fire Captain examinations in the past.

In support, the appellant submitted a March 5, 2025 doctor’s note that indicated that the appellant’s mother had been under medical care since March 2024; the appellant had been on continuous and intermittent leave during the medical care for his mother’s activities of daily living; and he was “currently on intermittent leave, recent FMLA forms were completed with the date of January 30, 2025.” The appellant also submitted a May 28, 2025 doctor’s note that contains the same information as the March 5, 2025 note, except that it indicates that “recent FMLA forms were completed with the date of May 19, 2025.”

Appellant's argumentThe appellant further submitted a copy of his work schedule for February 2025, which indicates that he was away from work February 3, 7, 11, 15, 19, and 23 and at work February 27, 2025.2 The appellant highlights that the notation “S” on the schedule stands for “sick.”3

The appointing authority was contacted for input on this matter. It confirmed the following: all eligible Fire Fighters were notified of the promotional announcement by mail; the promotional announcement was posted in all firehouses for the application period; Fire Administration sent an email to all eligible Fire Fighters; and the appellant was on intermittent, not continuous, FMLA during the application period. The appellant was apprised of the foregoing information.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.1(e) provides, in pertinent part, that applications for promotional examinations shall be submitted no later than 4:00 P.M. on the announced application filing date.

AnalysisThe appellant has the burden of proof in this matter. See N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b).

Upon review, the Commission declines to permit the appellant to file a late application. The appointing authority indicated that the promotional announcement was mailed to all eligible Fire Fighters. There is a presumption that mail correctly addressed, stamped, and mailed was received by the party to whom it was addressed. See SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State Department of Human Services, 146 N.J. 614 (1996); Szczesny v. Vasquez, 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354 (App. Div. 1962); In the Matter of Joseph Bahun, Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (App. Div. May 21, 2001). The appellant did not attempt to rebut that presumption or otherwise dispute that he was adequately notified of the promotional announcement. Further, in stating that “the test was annual on the 1st of the month,” the appellant acknowledges his understanding that the Fire Captain examination follows a regular announcement and testing schedule as was indicated in the Fire Promotional Announcement and Testing Schedule (Examination Information Alert), which is available on this agency’s website.4 Moreover, the appellant has applied for Fire Captain examinations in the past. As to the medical issues involving the appellant’s mother, the Commission is sympathetic. However, these issues still cannot justify permitting a late application. While the doctor’s notes reflect that the appellant was on continuous FMLA at some point, he was on intermittent FMLA for the relevant timeframe, i.e. the application filing period. Further, not all of the appellant’s absences from work in February 2025 were “sick”-related. In short, the appellant has not established that the inability to file an abbreviated application at some point during the afforded three-week window was excusable. Accordingly, there is not a sufficient basis in the record to allow the appellant to file a late application.

2 Thus, the document reflects that the appellant’s work schedule called for him to work one day followed by three days off. 3 However, two of the days, February 7 and 19, have a different notation, “V.”

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this request be denied.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

Decisions this one cites

  • SSI Medical Services, Inc. v. State Department of Human Services 146 N.J. 614
  • Szczesny v. Vasquez 71 N.J. Super. 347, 354
  • In the Matter of Joseph Bahun Docket No. A-1132-00T5F (May 21, 2001)

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.