John Thomas, CSC Docket No. 2025-76
NJ Civil Service Commission decision of May 21, 2025, CSC Docket No. 2025-76: removal from an eligible list, granted. John Thomas appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B), Newark School District.
Commission decisions · Meeting of May 21, 2025
John Thomas appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B), Newark School District.
- Matter
- Removal from an eligible list
- Decided
- May 21, 2025, item B-2
- Outcome
- Granted
- Title
- SUPERVISING ACCOUNT CLERK
- Employer
- Newark School District
- Examination
- M0629B
- Chair at the time
- Allison Chris Myers, Acting Chairperson
- Official decision
- CSC's PDF
Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.
Rules this decision applies
The decision
BackgroundJohn Thomas appeals the removal of his name from the eligible list for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B), Newark School District on the basis that he failed to respond to the certification notice.
The appellant, a non-veteran, took and passed the open-competitive examination for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B), which had a closing date of October 21. 2020. The resulting eligible list promulgated June 10, 2021 and expired on June 9, 2024. The appellant’s name was certified to the appointing authority on April 1, 2024 with a notice date of April 8, 2024. In disposing of the certification, the appointing authority requested the removal of the appellant’s name on the basis that he failed to respond to the certification notice. Certification notices instruct individuals to write to the appointing authority within five business days of the notice date to let it know whether or not the individual was interested in the position.
Appellant's argumentOn appeal to the Civil Service Commission (Commission), the appellant maintains that he timely responded to the certification notice via regular, certified and priority mail through the United States Postal Service (USPS). In support, he submits an April 5, 2024 certified mail receipt, an April 10, 2024 priority mail receipt, and the tracking numbers for both the certified and priority mail.1
1 USPS tracking indicates both were delivered.
CONCLUSION
RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(a)6 provides that an eligible’s name may be removed from a list for “non-compliance with the instructions listed on the notice of certification.” N.J.A.C. 4A:4-6.3(b), in conjunction with N.J.A.C. 4A:4-4.7(d), provides that the appellant has the burden of proof to show by a preponderance of the evidence that an appointing authority’s decision to remove his name from an eligible list was in error.
AnalysisThe appointing authority requested the removal of the appellant’s name from the eligible list for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B) on the basis of his failure to respond to the April 1, 2024 certification notice. However, the appellant has submitted proof that he timely responded to the certification notice. Specifically, he has provided receipts and tracking numbers that establish that he responded to the certification notice within the required time frame. Thus, it is appropriate that his name be restored to the subject eligible list.
ORDER
Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted and the eligible list for Supervising Account Clerk (M0629B), Newark School District, be revived in order for appellant to be considered for appointment at the time of the next certification for prospective employment opportunities only.
ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.
About this page
Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's PDF. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.
Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.
The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.
To report an error on this page, use the contact form.