N.J.A.C. 4A:1-2.1 Civil Service Commission access to appointing authority records and information
N.J.A.C. 4A:1-2.1, Civil Service Commission access to appointing authority records and information. Appointing authorities shall provide Civil Service Commission representatives free access to their premises and to requested records and information. Full text with 1 recorded amendment, 1 citing deci
Current through New Jersey Register, Vol. 58 No. 14, July 20, 2026. Reviewed as of July 26, 2026.
This is an annotated mirror, not the official publication. Verify against the Civil Service Commission before relying on it.
In plain language
Appointing authorities must let Civil Service Commission representatives onto their premises and hand over whatever records and information the Commission requests. The rule attaches no conditions to that. Nothing in it makes access depend on a complaint having been filed first, on an investigation having opened, or on the request being justified. The obligation runs in one direction only. What the Commission may then release from what it collects is a separate question, and 4A:1-2.2 answers it.
Written by the NJ Civil Service Navigator editorial team from the text of N.J.A.C. 4A:1-2.1. It is a description of the rule, not the rule itself, and not legal advice.
Appointing authorities shall provide Civil Service Commission representatives free access to their premises and to requested records and information.
Amendment history
Rule numbers, effective dates and New Jersey Register citations as published. 1 recorded change.
- AmendedR.2015 d.18547 N.J.R. 1369(a); 47 N.J.R. 2963(c)
How this rule has been applied
1 decision has cited N.J.A.C. 4A:1-2.1. The list below is citations to those decisions, not the decisions. We have not written summaries for this section. A citation with no summary is deliberate: we do not paraphrase a decision we have not read. Nothing here is legal advice.
Civil Service Commission final determinations (1)
- In re Newark Sch. Dist., CSC Docket No. 2018-2792017 N.J. CSC LEXIS 586Docket 2018-279