NJ Civil Service Navigator

Ingrid Fair, CSC Docket No. 2019-1680

NJ Civil Service Commission decision of February 6, 2019, CSC Docket No. 2019-1680: examination eligibility, granted. Ingrid Fair appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for

Commission decisions · Meeting of February 6, 2019

Ingrid Fair appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for Assistant Buyer (PS7678TN), Motor Vehicle Commission.

Matter
Examination eligibility
Decided
February 6, 2019, item B-10
Outcome
Granted
Title
ASSISTANT BUYER
Employer
Motor Vehicle Commission
Examination
PS7678TN
Chair at the time
Deirdre L. Webster Cobb, Chairperson
Official decision
Published by CSC in its monthly archive bundle (B-010 02-06-19.pdf)

Action recorded in the minutes: The Civil Service Commission directed that this appeal be granted.

Rules this decision applies

The decision

BackgroundIngrid Fair appeals the determination of the Division of Agency Services (Agency Services) which found that she did not meet the minimum requirements in experience for the promotional examination for Assistant Buyer (PS7678TN), Motor Vehicle Commission.

The subject examination had a closing date of June 21, 2018 and was open to employees in the competitive division who had an aggregate of one year of continuous permanent service as of the closing date in any competitive title and who met the open competitive requirements. These requirements included graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor’s degree, and one year of experience in the large-scale purchase of commodities, equipment and supplies. Applicants who did not possess the required education could substitute experience as indicated on a year for year basis. As there were no admitted candidates, the examination was cancelled on January 5, 2019.

Appellant's argumentThe appellant indicated that she possessed an Associate’s degree, and her 64 college credits prorated to two years, one month of experience. She listed four positions on her application: provisional Assistant Buyer, Purchasing Assistant, Technician MVC, and Assistant to Manager with Flower Shop of Pennington Market. Official records indicate that the appellant was a Customer Services Representative 4 for a portion of the time that she indicated she was a Technician MVC. The appellant was credited with two years, six months of experience in the first two positions, and she was found to be lacking five months of applicable experience. On appeal, the appellant submits a more detailed description of her duties for each position.

CONCLUSION

RuleN.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) provides that applicants shall meet all requirements specified in the promotional examination announcement by the closing date. N.J.A.C. 4A:1-1.2(c) states that the Commission may relax a rule for good cause in particular situations, on notice to affected parties, in order to effectuate the purposes of Title 11A, New Jersey Statutes.

AnalysisA review of the appellant’s application reveals that the decision by Agency Services, denying the appellant’s admittance to the subject examination since she does not possess the required experience, was correct. She received credit for her experience as a provisional in the subject title, and as a Purchasing Assistant. However, she could not receive credit for her remaining experience, as the experience did not have the large-scale purchase of commodities, equipment and supplies as the primary focus of the position. Nonetheless, the examination was cancelled, the appellant is still serving as a provisional appointee, and she has accrued at least an additional five months of full-time experience since the June 2018 closing date. Based on the circumstances presented, good cause has been established to relax the provisions of N.J.A.C. 4A:4-2.6(a) to accept the appellant’s additional experience beyond the closing date and admit her to the examination for prospective appointment consideration.

ORDER

Therefore, it is ordered that this appeal be granted, the cancellation be rescinded, and the appellant’s application be processed.

ClosingThis is the final administrative determination in this matter. Any further review should be pursued in a judicial forum.

About this page

Not an official copy. The decision of record is CSC's monthly archive. The text above was extracted from it and may differ in layout or, rarely, in a character.

Names appear as the Commission published them in its public minutes and decisions, initials where it used initials. This site does not offer a search by a person's name.

The labels are ours. The kind of matter and the outcome are our reading of the minutes; the ACTION text the Commission recorded is quoted verbatim above. A decision applies the rules to its own facts and is not a prediction for any other matter, and nothing here is legal advice.

To report an error on this page, use the contact form.